Paper · 2025 · BMC Plant Biology

Adaptation of lentil to Northern European agro-climatic conditions: effect of sowing time and sowing rate on lentil development, productivity and weed suppression

Monika Toleikiene; Lina Sarunaite; Shiv Kumar Agrawal; et al.

15
claims
27
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The agronomic, economic, and cultural significance of lentil positions it as a potentially valuable crop in Europe. Only a few studies have investigated lentil cultivation in the central and northern parts of Europe. This study assessed the phenological development, productivity, yield quality, and weed suppression of better adapted lentil varieties to cool, temperate climatic conditions at a latitude of 55 °N. The effects of three sowing times and three seed rates were investigated as important factors for lentil performance in organic farming systems. The length of the lentil vegetation period varied from 96 to 119 days at this latitude. The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days. During the reproductive stage, delayed sowing times had a significant negative effect on pod and seed formation and grain yield. A delay of 20 days in sowing time produced 8.7% more non-productive branches, 37.5% more non-productive pods, and 9% lower 1000-seed weight. A delay in sowing time by 10 and 20 days decreased grain yield by 14% and 23%. However, sowing time had a significant effect on weed suppression. The number of annual weeds was significantly reduced by 31% when lentil was sown 10 days later and by 78% when it was sown 20 days later. Increasing the seed rate from 160 to 240 and later to 320 seeds m -2 provided up to 200 kg ha -1 yield supplement and reduced the biomass of annual weeds. This study showed that in organic farming systems, an average grain yield of 1578 kg ha -1 could be obtained at a latitude 55 °N, suggesting early sowing at the end of April or the beginning of May, with high seed rates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying lentil sowing by 10 or 20 days shortened the vegetative phase by 14–24%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Organ / stage
vegetative phasee0
Treatment
delayed by 10 or 20 dayse0
Outcome
duration of the vegetative phasee0
Direction
shortenede0
Value
14–24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying lentil sowing by 10 or 20 days shortened the reproductive phase by 12–25%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
delayed by 10 or 20 dayse0
Outcome
reproductive phasee0
Direction
shortenede0
Value
12–25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed lentil sowing had a significant negative effect on pod and seed formation and grain yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Organ / stage
reproductive stagee1
Treatment
delayed sowing timese1
Outcome
pod and seed formation and grain yielde1
Direction
negativee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“During the reproductive stage, delayed sowing times had a significant negative effect on pod and seed formation and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 20-day sowing delay produced 8.7% more non-productive branches in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
A delay of 20 days in sowing timee1
Outcome
non-productive branchese1
Direction
moree1
Value
8.7%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“A delay of 20 days in sowing time produced 8.7% more non-productive branches, 37.5% more non-productive pods, and 9% lower 1000-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 20-day sowing delay produced 37.5% more non-productive pods in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
A delay of 20 days in sowing timee1
Outcome
non-productive podse1
Direction
moree1
Value
37.5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“A delay of 20 days in sowing time produced 8.7% more non-productive branches, 37.5% more non-productive pods, and 9% lower 1000-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 20-day sowing delay lowered lentil 1000-seed weight by 9%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
A delay of 20 days in sowing timee1
Outcome
1000-seed weighte1
Direction
lowere1
Value
9%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“A delay of 20 days in sowing time produced 8.7% more non-productive branches, 37.5% more non-productive pods, and 9% lower 1000-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10-day sowing delay decreased lentil grain yield by 14%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
A delay in sowing time by 10e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
14%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“A delay in sowing time by 10 and 20 days decreased grain yield by 14% and 23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 20-day sowing delay decreased lentil grain yield by 23%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
20 dayse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
23%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“A delay in sowing time by 10 and 20 days decreased grain yield by 14% and 23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing lentil 10 days later significantly reduced the number of annual weeds by 31%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
lentil was sown 10 days latere1
Interactor
annual weedse1weed
Outcome
number of annual weedse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
31%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of annual weeds was significantly reduced by 31% when lentil was sown 10 days later and by 78% when it was sown 20 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing lentil 20 days later significantly reduced the number of annual weeds by 78%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
it was sown 20 days latere1
Interactor
annual weedse1weed
Outcome
number of annual weedse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
78%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of annual weeds was significantly reduced by 31% when lentil was sown 10 days later and by 78% when it was sown 20 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the seed rate to 320 seeds m -2 provided up to 200 kg ha -1 yield supplement in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Increasing the seed rate from 160 to 240 and later to 320 seeds m -2e1
Outcome
yield supplemente1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
up to 200 kg ha -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the seed rate from 160 to 240 and later to 320 seeds m -2 provided up to 200 kg ha -1 yield supplement and reduced the biomass of annual weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the seed rate reduced the biomass of annual weeds in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Increasing the seed rate from 160 to 240 and later to 320 seeds m -2e1
Interactor
annual weedse1weed
Outcome
biomass of annual weedse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of the vegetative phase was shortened by 14–24% and the reproductive phase by 12–25% when sowing of lentil was delayed by 10 or 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the seed rate from 160 to 240 and later to 320 seeds m -2 provided up to 200 kg ha -1 yield supplement and reduced the biomass of annual weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1505 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An average lentil grain yield of 1578 kg ha -1 could be obtained in organic farming systems at 55 °N.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
average grain yielde0
Value
1578 kg ha -1e0
Qualifier
at a latitude 55 °Ne0
Setting
organic farming systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adaptation of lentil to Northern European agro-climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“in organic farming systems, an average grain yield of 1578 kg ha -1 could be obtained at a latitude 55 °N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1635 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lentil vegetation period lasted 96 to 119 days at 55 °N.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
length of the lentil vegetation periode0
Value
96 to 119 dayse0
Qualifier
at this latitudee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The length of the lentil vegetation period varied from 96 to 119 days at this latitude”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–646 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest early sowing at the end of April or the beginning of May with high seed rates for lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
high seed ratese0
Outcome
early sowing at the end of April or the beginning of Maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adaptation of lentil to Northern European agro-climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“suggesting early sowing at the end of April or the beginning of May, with high seed rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1726 · show in text ↑

sowing time · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

sowing time · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 24 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

density · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.