Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed management in lentil

Rohit Yadav; Vivek Vivek; R.V. Singh; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to explore the feasibility of growing lentil with integration of weed management practices using herbicide, increased plant population and manual weeding at Meerut during 2008-09 and 2009-10. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with four replications and ten treatments. The major weeds in experimental field were Chenopodium album, Phalaris minor, Anagalis arvensis and Convolvulus arvensis were recorded with some other minor weed species. Lowest weed density (4 m 2 ) and dry weight (2.64 g/m 2 ) was recorded where pendimethalin was applied 0.75 kg/ha as PE plus one hand weeding, which was statistically on par with pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha. Whereas, the highest grain yield of 1662 kg/ha was recorded by pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha plus one hand weeding, which was statistically at par with weed free as well as pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha. Increased seed rate of 25% significantly decreased the weed dry weight (32.0%) and increased seed yield (22.8%) in comparison to their respective treatments. On an average of 37.7% yield reduction was recorded due to weed infestation. The highest gross returns of 23,268, net returns of 15,918 and B:C was recorded by pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE + one hand weeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density in lentil was lowest (4 m-2) with pendimethalin at 0.75 kg/ha PE plus one hand weeding.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
pendimethalin was applied 0.75 kg/ha as PE plus one hand weedinge0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
Loweste0
Value
4 m 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lowest weed density (4 m 2 ) and dry weight (2.64 g/m 2 ) was recorded where pendimethalin was applied 0.75 kg/ha as PE plus one hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed dry weight in lentil was lowest (2.64 g/m2) with pendimethalin at 0.75 kg/ha PE plus one hand weeding.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
pendimethalin was applied 0.75 kg/ha as PE plus one hand weedinge0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
Loweste0
Value
2.64 g/m 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lowest weed density (4 m 2 ) and dry weight (2.64 g/m 2 ) was recorded where pendimethalin was applied 0.75 kg/ha as PE plus one hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil grain yield was highest (1662 kg/ha) with pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha plus one hand weeding.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha plus one hand weedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1662 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest grain yield of 1662 kg/ha was recorded by pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha plus one hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25% higher seed rate significantly decreased weed dry weight by 32.0% compared with the respective treatments.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Increased seed rate of 25%e0
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
32.0%e0
Comparator
their respective treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increased seed rate of 25% significantly decreased the weed dry weight (32.0%) and increased seed yield (22.8%) in comparison to their respective treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25% higher seed rate significantly increased lentil seed yield by 22.8% compared with the respective treatments.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Increased seed rate of 25%e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.8%e0
Comparator
their respective treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increased seed rate of 25% significantly decreased the weed dry weight (32.0%) and increased seed yield (22.8%) in comparison to their respective treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1047 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation reduced yield by 37.7% on average.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Value
37.7%e0
Qualifier
due to weed infestatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“On an average of 37.7% yield reduction was recorded due to weed infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross returns were highest (23,268) with pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE plus one hand weeding.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE + one hand weedinge0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
23,268e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest gross returns of 23,268, net returns of 15,918 and B:C was recorded by pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE + one hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns were highest (15,918) with pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE plus one hand weeding.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE + one hand weedinge0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15,918e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest gross returns of 23,268, net returns of 15,918 and B:C was recorded by pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE + one hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit-cost ratio was highest with pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE plus one hand weeding.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE + one hand weedinge0
Outcome
B:Ce0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest gross returns of 23,268, net returns of 15,918 and B:C was recorded by pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE + one hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1255 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The major weeds in the lentil field were Chenopodium album, Phalaris minor, Anagalis arvensis and Convolvulus arvensis.

Taxon
Chenopodium album, Phalaris minor, Anagalis arvensis and Convolvulus arvensise0
Outcome
major weedse0
Setting
experimental fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The major weeds in experimental field were Chenopodium album, Phalaris minor, Anagalis arvensis and Convolvulus arvensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–443 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

herbicide · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

herbicide · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

density · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

density · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.