Paper · 2017 · Physiologia Plantarum

Carbohydrate metabolism in the subtending leaf cross‐acclimates to waterlogging and elevated temperature stress and influences boll biomass in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Haimiao Wang; Yinglong Chen; Wei Hu; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
60
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Short-term waterlogging and chronic elevated temperature occur concomitantly in the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) growing season. While previous research about co-occurring waterlogging and elevated temperature has focused primarily on cotton fiber, no studies have investigated carbohydrate metabolism of the subtending leaf (a major source leaf for boll development) cross-acclimation to aforementioned stressors. To address this, plants were exposed to ambient (31.6/26.5°C) and elevated (34.1/29.0°C) temperatures during the whole flowering and boll formation stage, and waterlogging (0, 3, 6 days) beginning on the day of anthesis. Both waterlogging and high temperature limited boll biomass (reduced by 1.19-32.14%), but effects of different durations of waterlogging coupled with elevated temperature on carbohydrate metabolism in the subtending leaf were quite different. The 6-day waterlogging combined with elevated temperature had the most negative impact on net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and carbohydrate metabolism of any treatment, leading to upregulated GhSusA and GhSusC expression and enhanced sucrose synthase (SuSy, EC 2.4.1.13) activity for sucrose degradation. A prior exposure to waterlogging for 3 days improved subtending leaf performance under elevated temperature. Pn, sucrose concentrations, Rubisco (EC 4.1.1.39) activity, and cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (cy-FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11) activity in the subtending leaf significantly increased, while SuSy activity decreased under 3 days waterlogging and elevated temperature combined relative to elevated temperature alone. Thus, we concluded that previous exposure to a brief (3 days) waterlogging stress improved sucrose composition and accumulation cross-acclimation to high temperature later in development not only by promoting leaf photosynthesis but also inhibiting sucrose degradation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging combined with elevated temperature reduced cotton boll biomass by 1.19-32.14%

Organ / stage
bolle1
Treatment
waterlogging and high temperaturee1
Outcome
boll biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.19-32.14%e1
Comparator
ambient (31.6/26.5°C)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both waterlogging and high temperature limited boll biomass (reduced by 1.19-32.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–719 · show in text ↑
e2

“plants were exposed to ambient (31.6/26.5°C) and elevated (34.1/29.0°C) temperatures during the whole flowering and boll formation stage, and waterlogging (0, 3, 6 days) beginning on the day of anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 6-day waterlogging combined with elevated temperature had the most negative impact on net photosynthetic rate and carbohydrate metabolism of any treatment

Treatment
6-day waterlogging combined with elevated temperaturee1
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (Pn)e1
Direction
most negative impacte1
Comparator
any treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 6-day waterlogging combined with elevated temperature had the most negative impact on net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and carbohydrate metabolism of any treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pn, sucrose concentrations and Rubisco activity in the subtending leaf increased under 3 days waterlogging combined with elevated temperature relative to elevated temperature alone

Organ / stage
subtending leafe1
Treatment
3 days waterlogging and elevated temperature combinede1
Outcome
Pn, sucrose concentrations, Rubisco (EC 4.1.1.39) activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
elevated temperature alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pn, sucrose concentrations, Rubisco (EC 4.1.1.39) activity, and cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (cy-FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11) activity in the subtending leaf significantly increased, while SuSy activity decreased under 3 days waterlogging and elevated temperature combined relative to elevated temperature alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase activity in the subtending leaf increased under 3 days waterlogging combined with elevated temperature relative to elevated temperature alone

Organ / stage
subtending leafe1
Treatment
3 days waterlogging and elevated temperature combinede1
Gene
cy-FBPasee1
Outcome
cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (cy-FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11) activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
elevated temperature alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pn, sucrose concentrations, Rubisco (EC 4.1.1.39) activity, and cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (cy-FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11) activity in the subtending leaf significantly increased, while SuSy activity decreased under 3 days waterlogging and elevated temperature combined relative to elevated temperature alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose synthase activity decreased in the subtending leaf under 3 days waterlogging combined with elevated temperature relative to elevated temperature alone

Organ / stage
subtending leafe1
Treatment
3 days waterlogging and elevated temperature combinede1
Gene
SuSye1
Outcome
SuSy activitye1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
elevated temperature alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pn, sucrose concentrations, Rubisco (EC 4.1.1.39) activity, and cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (cy-FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11) activity in the subtending leaf significantly increased, while SuSy activity decreased under 3 days waterlogging and elevated temperature combined relative to elevated temperature alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 6-day waterlogging combined with elevated temperature upregulated GhSusA and GhSusC expression in cotton

Treatment
6-day waterlogging combined with elevated temperaturee1
Gene
GhSusA and GhSusCe2
Outcome
GhSusA and GhSusC expressione2
Direction
upregulatede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 6-day waterlogging combined with elevated temperature had the most negative impact on net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and carbohydrate metabolism of any treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1041 · show in text ↑
e2

“leading to upregulated GhSusA and GhSusC expression and enhanced sucrose synthase (SuSy, EC 2.4.1.13) activity for sucrose degradation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose synthase activity was enhanced under 6-day waterlogging combined with elevated temperature

Treatment
6-day waterlogging combined with elevated temperaturee1
Gene
SuSye2
Outcome
sucrose synthase (SuSy, EC 2.4.1.13) activitye2
Direction
enhancede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 6-day waterlogging combined with elevated temperature had the most negative impact on net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and carbohydrate metabolism of any treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1041 · show in text ↑
e2

“leading to upregulated GhSusA and GhSusC expression and enhanced sucrose synthase (SuSy, EC 2.4.1.13) activity for sucrose degradation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior exposure to 3 days of waterlogging improved subtending leaf performance under elevated temperature in cotton

Organ / stage
subtending leafe1
Treatment
prior exposure to waterlogging for 3 dayse1
Outcome
subtending leaf performancee1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“A prior exposure to waterlogging for 3 days improved subtending leaf performance under elevated temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1286 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior 3-day waterlogging is concluded to improve sucrose accumulation and cross-acclimation to high temperature by promoting leaf photosynthesis and inhibiting sucrose degradation

Treatment
previous exposure to a brief (3 days) waterlogging stresse1
Outcome
sucrose composition and accumulatione1
Qualifier
promoting leaf photosynthesis but also inhibiting sucrose degradatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“previous exposure to a brief (3 days) waterlogging stress improved sucrose composition and accumulation cross-acclimation to high temperature later in development not only by promoting leaf photosynthesis but also inhibiting sucrose degradation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1870 · show in text ↑

heat · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

15 papers: 2 positive, 13 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

flooding · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

25 papers: 5 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

heat · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

heat · molecular: expression · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 2 positive, 12 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

heat · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 4 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

flooding · molecular: expression · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.