Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at District Seed Farm (AB Block), Kalyani under Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya during winter season of 2014-16in upland situation to study the effect of date of sowing on the growth and yield of wheat genotypes with an objective to optimize row spacing for yield maximization in wheat genotypes. The experiment was carried out in a split plot design with three wheat genotypes (HD 2977, DBW 103, K 0307, HD 2733 and DBW 39) and three row arrangements (15, 18 and 21 cm) and experiment was replicated thrice. Amongst various tested cultivars, highest LAI at 50 and 65 DAS was registered with the HD 2967 and K 0307, respectively. Both are at par to each other and significantly superior to other set of treatments. Statistically more number of tillers/m2 was observed with the HD 2967 and showed parity with the HD 2733. Number of tillers/m2 maximum observed with 18 cm and significantly better to rest of the assorted units. Further, days to 50% heading least observed with the 21 cm row spacing, and significantly superior to other treatments. Moreover, days to physiological maturity took least time with the 15 cm spacing and statistically better to other set of treatments. Grains per ear head was highest registered with the DBW 39 and showed parity with the K0307, and significantly better to other treatments. Test weight failed to produce any significant response. Highest grain yield was registered with the HD 2967 (3.79 t/ha), and was at par with the DBW 39 (3.41 t/ha) and K0307 (3.21 t/ha), and statistically better to rest of the treatments combination. More straw yield was observed with HD 2967 (5.94 t/ha) and was at par with DBW 39 (5.41 t/ha). With various subplot treatments, maximum grain and straw yield was observed with the 18 cm (3.53 and 6.03 t/ha), and showed parity with 15 cm row spacing (3.21 and 5.87 t/ha). Highest B: C ratio recorded with the HD 2967 (1.70) with row spacing of 18 cm (1.64).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
HD 2967 had the highest LAI at 50 DAS, significantly superior to other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Material
- HD 2967e2
- Outcome
- LAIe2
- Direction
- higheste2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“Amongst various tested cultivars, highest LAI at 50 and 65 DAS was registered with the HD 2967 and K 0307, respectively”
e3“Both are at par to each other and significantly superior to other set of treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
K 0307 had the highest LAI at 65 DAS, significantly superior to other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- K 0307e2
- Outcome
- LAIe2
- Direction
- higheste2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“Amongst various tested cultivars, highest LAI at 50 and 65 DAS was registered with the HD 2967 and K 0307, respectively”
e3“Both are at par to each other and significantly superior to other set of treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
HD 2967 had more tillers per square metre than other cultivars.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- HD 2967e4
- Outcome
- tillers/m2e4
- Direction
- moree4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e4“Statistically more number of tillers/m2 was observed with the HD 2967”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing of 18 cm gave the maximum number of tillers per square metre, significantly better than the other spacings.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 18 cme5
- Outcome
- tillers/m2e5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Comparator
- rest of the assorted unitse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e5“Number of tillers/m2 maximum observed with 18 cm and significantly better to rest of the assorted units”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing of 21 cm gave the least days to 50% heading, significantly superior to other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 21 cm row spacinge6
- Outcome
- days to 50% headinge6
- Direction
- leaste6
- Comparator
- other treatmentse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e6“days to 50% heading least observed with the 21 cm row spacing, and significantly superior to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing of 15 cm gave the least time to physiological maturity, statistically better than other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 15 cm spacinge7
- Outcome
- days to physiological maturitye7
- Direction
- least timee7
- Comparator
- other set of treatmentse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e7“days to physiological maturity took least time with the 15 cm spacing and statistically better to other set of treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
DBW 39 had the highest grains per ear head, at par with K0307 and significantly better than other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- DBW 39e2
- Outcome
- Grains per ear heade2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Comparator
- K0307e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“Grains per ear head was highest registered with the DBW 39 and showed parity with the K0307, and significantly better to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Test weight of wheat showed no significant response to the treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Outcome
- Test weighte2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“Test weight failed to produce any significant response”
Claim · model-written summary
HD 2967 gave the highest grain yield, 3.79 t/ha, statistically better than the rest of the treatment combinations.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- HD 2967e2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- Higheste2
- Value
- 3.79 t/hae2
- Comparator
- rest of the treatments combinatione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“Highest grain yield was registered with the HD 2967 (3.79 t/ha), and was at par with the DBW 39 (3.41 t/ha) and K0307 (3.21 t/ha), and statistically better to rest of the treatments combination”
Claim · model-written summary
DBW 39 grain yield (3.41 t/ha) was at par with HD 2967.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- DBW 39e2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Value
- 3.41 t/hae2
- Comparator
- HD 2967e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“Highest grain yield was registered with the HD 2967 (3.79 t/ha), and was at par with the DBW 39 (3.41 t/ha) and K0307 (3.21 t/ha), and statistically better to rest of the treatments combination”
Claim · model-written summary
K0307 grain yield (3.21 t/ha) was at par with HD 2967.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- K0307e2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Value
- 3.21 t/hae2
- Comparator
- HD 2967e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“Highest grain yield was registered with the HD 2967 (3.79 t/ha), and was at par with the DBW 39 (3.41 t/ha) and K0307 (3.21 t/ha), and statistically better to rest of the treatments combination”
Claim · model-written summary
HD 2967 gave the most straw yield, 5.94 t/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- HD 2967e2
- Outcome
- straw yielde2
- Direction
- Moree2
- Value
- 5.94 t/hae2
- Comparator
- DBW 39e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“More straw yield was observed with HD 2967 (5.94 t/ha) and was at par with DBW 39 (5.41 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
DBW 39 straw yield (5.41 t/ha) was at par with HD 2967.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- DBW 39e2
- Outcome
- straw yielde2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Value
- 5.41 t/hae2
- Comparator
- HD 2967e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“More straw yield was observed with HD 2967 (5.94 t/ha) and was at par with DBW 39 (5.41 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing of 18 cm gave the maximum grain yield (3.53), at par with 15 cm row spacing.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 18 cme2
- Outcome
- graine2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 3.53e2
- Comparator
- 15 cm row spacinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“maximum grain and straw yield was observed with the 18 cm (3.53 and 6.03 t/ha), and showed parity with 15 cm row spacing (3.21 and 5.87 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing of 18 cm gave the maximum straw yield (6.03), at par with 15 cm row spacing.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 18 cme2
- Outcome
- strawe2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 6.03e2
- Comparator
- 15 cm row spacinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“maximum grain and straw yield was observed with the 18 cm (3.53 and 6.03 t/ha), and showed parity with 15 cm row spacing (3.21 and 5.87 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
HD 2967 gave the highest B:C ratio, 1.70.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“Highest B: C ratio recorded with the HD 2967 (1.70) with row spacing of 18 cm (1.64)”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing of 18 cm gave a B:C ratio of 1.64.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- row spacing of 18 cme2
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe2
- Value
- 1.64e2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”
e2“Highest B: C ratio recorded with the HD 2967 (1.70) with row spacing of 18 cm (1.64)”
The same questions in other papers
density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.