Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Row spacing of 18 cm gave a B:C ratio of 1.64.

A claim from Evaluation of Performance of New Wheat Cultivar under Different Row Spacing · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing of 18 cm gave a B:C ratio of 1.64.

Treatment
row spacing of 18 cme2
Outcome
B: C ratioe2
Value
1.64e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“growth and yield of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–249
e2

“Highest B: C ratio recorded with the HD 2967 (1.70) with row spacing of 18 cm (1.64)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–1962

Title

Evaluation of Performance of New Wheat Cultivar under Different Row Spacing

Dhiman Mukherjee International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.606.375

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-2e61a2e949fc6b505b1c3b5f92704c2fdf0e52a74db57c230b3184cca57dbb23 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    At 20.0 cm row spacing, wheat recorded the highest Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers and effective tillers over other row spacings.

    Performance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties under different row spacing · 2012 · compared with other row spacing

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Closer 15 cm rows increased wheat yield and yield attributes relative to 20 cm rows.

    Influence of row orientation, row spacing and weed-control methods on physiological performance of irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2001 · compared with wider row spacing of 20 cm

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Breeder seed at 22.5 cm spacing and 120 kg ha-1 seed rate maximized plant height, tillers, and ear length.

    Effect of growth parameters at different levels of seed rate in wheat under irrigated area · 2020 · compared with other treatments combinations

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. no effect
    Sowing density did not affect yield in 2000.

    Field evaluation of early vigour for genetic improvement of grain yield in wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Spacing changes did not significantly affect grain yield.

    Genotype, sowing date and plant spacing influence on high-yielding irrigated wheat in southern New South Wales. II. Growth, yield and nitrogen use · 1990

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Nitrogen level, N timing and seeding rate had no significant effect on spring wheat grain yield across environments.

    Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Management Effects on Spring Wheat Yield and Yield Components · 2007

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Lower seeding rates reduced grain yield by 0.8 Mg ha −1.

    Seeding Rate and Genotype Effect on Agronomic Performance and End‐Use Quality of Winter Wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Increasing sowing density from 50 to 100 kg/ha had little influence on yield or yield-related characteristics of restricted and freely tillering lines.

    Agronomic evaluation of a tiller inhibition gene (tin) in wheat. I. Effect on yield, yield components, and grain protein · 2005

    Opposite direction

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.