Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Influence of row orientation, row spacing and weed-control methods on physiological performance of irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum)

N. N. ANGIRAS; VINOD SHARMA

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was laid out in split-plot design with 3 replications to study the effect of combinations of 3 row directions (north-south, south-west and bi-directional) and 2 spacings (15 cm and 20 cm) + broadcast sowing and 4 weed-control treatments (unweeded check, isoproturon 0.75 kg1 ha, isopmturon 1.50 kglha and hid-weeding twice 30 and 60 days after sowing) on performance of wheat (Triticutn nestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.). Bi-directional row orientation increased the yield due to increased leaf-area index (LAI), crop-growth rate (CGR), yield attributes and reduced the weed growth nte, followed by north-south mw direction. Closer row spacing of 15 cm reduced the weed dry matter and thus increased the LAI, CGR, yield and yield attributes of wheat over wider row spacing of 20 cm. All the weed-control treatments increased the yield, yield attributes and decreased the weed biomass significantly over the unweeded check. Isoproturon 1.5 kglha was the best among weedcontrol treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bidirectional rows increased wheat yield, leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield attributes.

Treatment
Bi-directional row orientatione0
Outcome
yield due to increased leaf-area index (LAI), crop-growth rate (CGR), yield attributese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bi-directional row orientation increased the yield due to increased leaf-area index (LAI), crop-growth rate (CGR), yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–567 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bidirectional rows reduced weed growth rate.

Treatment
Bi-directional row orientatione0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growth ntee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bi-directional row orientation increased the yield due to increased leaf-area index (LAI), crop-growth rate (CGR), yield attributes and reduced the weed growth nte”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 15 cm rows reduced weed dry matter relative to 20 cm rows.

Treatment
Closer row spacing of 15 cme0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
wider row spacing of 20 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Closer row spacing of 15 cm reduced the weed dry matter and thus increased the LAI, CGR, yield and yield attributes of wheat over wider row spacing of 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 15 cm rows increased wheat leaf area index and crop growth rate relative to 20 cm rows.

Treatment
Closer row spacing of 15 cme0
Outcome
LAI, CGRe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
wider row spacing of 20 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Closer row spacing of 15 cm reduced the weed dry matter and thus increased the LAI, CGR, yield and yield attributes of wheat over wider row spacing of 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 15 cm rows increased wheat yield and yield attributes relative to 20 cm rows.

Treatment
Closer row spacing of 15 cme0
Outcome
yield and yield attributes of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
wider row spacing of 20 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Closer row spacing of 15 cm reduced the weed dry matter and thus increased the LAI, CGR, yield and yield attributes of wheat over wider row spacing of 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control increased wheat yield and yield attributes over an unweeded check.

Treatment
weed-control treatmentse0
Outcome
yield, yield attributese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed-control treatments increased the yield, yield attributes and decreased the weed biomass significantly over the unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control decreased weed biomass over an unweeded check.

Treatment
weed-control treatmentse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed-control treatments increased the yield, yield attributes and decreased the weed biomass significantly over the unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon 1.5 kglha was the best weed-control treatment.

Treatment
Isoproturon 1.5 kglhae0
Outcome
beste0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon 1.5 kglha was the best among weedcontrol treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑

density · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 37 positive, 9 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 81 positive, 29 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.