Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined treatment increased wheat yield by 21.3% compared with control.

A claim from Implication of Crop Row Orientation and Row Spacing for Controlling Weeds and Increasing Yield in Wheat · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased wheat yield by 21.3% compared with control.

Treatment
E-W crop row direction + 20 cm row spacing + hand weeding twicee0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
21.3 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best results obtained in this regard were for the treatment (E-W crop row direction + 20 cm row spacing + hand weeding twice). Compared to control, the data recorded 43.9 % increase in crop growth (on the basis of dry matter weight) and 21.3 % in crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1087
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103

Title

Implication of Crop Row Orientation and Row Spacing for Controlling Weeds and Increasing Yield in Wheat

M. Hozayn; T. A. El-Shahawy; Faida Sharara AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES 2012

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-a1b2b3b0edcd136ba98982bd939dcd8b1e49bae98d9a467bf2fdbd65babb0f73 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Closer 15 cm rows increased wheat yield and yield attributes relative to 20 cm rows.

    Influence of row orientation, row spacing and weed-control methods on physiological performance of irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2001 · compared with wider row spacing of 20 cm

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    The 15.0 cm row spacing gave significantly higher grain yield (54.0 q/ha) than 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacings.

    Improvement of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Different Row Spacings and Varieties · 2017 · compared with 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacing crop

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    Row spacing increased 1000 seed weight.

    Identification of Potential Agronomic Practices for Wheat (Triticum Aestivuml.) Under Agro-Climatic Condition of District Nowshera, Pakistan · 2024

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. positive
    A 120 kg ha −1 planting density significantly increased tillers per square meter (433.39 tiller m −2) in bread wheat.

    Influence of Row Orientation and Planting Density on Some Growth Characteristics, Grain Yield and Quality Indices of Bread Wheat Cultivars · 2025

    Same directionCites this paper

  5. no effect
    Sowing density did not affect yield in 2000.

    Field evaluation of early vigour for genetic improvement of grain yield in wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Spacing changes did not significantly affect grain yield.

    Genotype, sowing date and plant spacing influence on high-yielding irrigated wheat in southern New South Wales. II. Growth, yield and nitrogen use · 1990

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nitrogen level, N timing and seeding rate had no significant effect on spring wheat grain yield across environments.

    Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Management Effects on Spring Wheat Yield and Yield Components · 2007

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Lower seeding rates reduced grain yield by 0.8 Mg ha −1.

    Seeding Rate and Genotype Effect on Agronomic Performance and End‐Use Quality of Winter Wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Weed control increased wheat yield and yield attributes over an unweeded check.

    Influence of row orientation, row spacing and weed-control methods on physiological performance of irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2001 · compared with unweeded check

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Herbicide application to the culm affected the ear and biased the final grain weight.

    Photosynthetic contribution of the ear to grain filling in wheat: a comparison of different methodologies for evaluation · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Alternative PRE herbicides did not reduce crop yield.

    Control of Rigid Ryegrass in Australian Wheat Production with Pyroxasulfone · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Grain yield did not differ significantly between the treatments.

    Impact of site-specific weed management on herbicide savings and winter wheat yield · 2013 · compared with the treatments

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    All weed management treatments gave similar gross returns for each crop and for the rotation.

    Evaluation of alternative weed management systems in a modified no-tillage corn–soybean–winter wheat rotation: weed densities, crop yield, and economics · 2002

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Wheat yield loss rose with herbicide rate.

    Wheat Response to Simulated Drift of Glyphosate and Imazamox Applied at Two Growth Stages · 2006

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    The herbicide mixture tended to reduce wheat yield by 0.6 t ha(-1) in one trial.

    Estimating economic thresholds for site‐specific weed control using manual weed counts and sensor technology: An example based on three winter wheat trials · 2013

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Metribuzin injury significantly reduced wheat yield across application stages.

    Alternatives to Diclofop for the Control of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)1 · 2003

    Opposite direction

554 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.