Paper · 2017 · Cogent Food & Agriculture

Optimum potassium fertilization level for growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Vertisols of Northern Ethiopia

Hagos Brhane; Tekalign Mamo; Kassa Teka

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Potassium fertilization was started in 2014 using K containing blended fertilizers in Ethiopia. However, there was no evidence whether the recommended rates of K in the blended formula (which is between 7 and 12 kg/ha in the form of K2O) meets the crop demand on different soil reference groups or not. So, a field experiments were conducted to determine the optimum rate of potassium for yield and nutrient uptake of wheat in Vertisols of northern Ethiopia. The experiments were laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with 4 levels of potassium (0, 30, 60, 90, of kg/ha K2O) in three replications. Results depicted that the highest biological yield (straw + grain) and grain yields of wheat were increased with K rates. But, the partial budget analysis revealed that 60 K2O kg/ha is economically feasible rate for wheat in Vertisols of the area. On the other hand, the highest apparent K recovery and agronomic use efficiencies were found at 30 kg/ha K2O. Then it is concluded that the level of K in the blended formula was not enough to meet the yield requirement of wheat. Therefore, K should be applied independently rather than in blended for Vertisols of the area studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat biological yield increased with K rates.

Treatment
K ratese0
Outcome
biological yield (straw + grain)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest biological yield (straw + grain) and grain yields of wheat were increased with K rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield increased with K rates.

Treatment
K ratese0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest biological yield (straw + grain) and grain yields of wheat were increased with K rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–726 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial budget analysis found 60 K2O kg/ha economically feasible for wheat.

Outcome
economically feasible ratee0
Value
60 K2O kg/hae0
Setting
Vertisols of the areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the partial budget analysis revealed that 60 K2O kg/ha is economically feasible rate for wheat in Vertisols of the area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent K recovery was highest at 30 kg/ha K2O.

Treatment
30 kg/ha K2Oe0
Outcome
apparent K recoverye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest apparent K recovery and agronomic use efficiencies were found at 30 kg/ha K2O.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic use efficiency was highest at 30 kg/ha K2O.

Treatment
30 kg/ha K2Oe0
Outcome
agronomic use efficienciese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest apparent K recovery and agronomic use efficiencies were found at 30 kg/ha K2O.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded K in the blended formula was insufficient for wheat yield requirements.

Outcome
yield requirement of wheate0
Qualifier
level of K in the blended formula was not enoughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the level of K in the blended formula was not enough to meet the yield requirement of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1081 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend independent K application for Vertisols in the study area.

Outcome
K should be applied independently rather than in blendede0
Setting
Vertisols of the area studiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K should be applied independently rather than in blended for Vertisols of the area studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.