Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat biological yield increased with K rates.

A claim from Optimum potassium fertilization level for growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Vertisols of Northern Ethiopia · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat biological yield increased with K rates.

Treatment
K ratese0
Outcome
biological yield (straw + grain)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest biological yield (straw + grain) and grain yields of wheat were increased with K rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–726

Title

Optimum potassium fertilization level for growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Vertisols of Northern Ethiopia

Hagos Brhane; Tekalign Mamo; Kassa Teka Cogent Food & Agriculture 2017. doi:10.1080/23311932.2017.1347022

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-bc4e2d09dff8514f0d2065392a8c00c2d76b0b545d7c0b6d93809ca34380cea1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Nitrogen levels significantly increased wheat grain yield, optimum at 125 kg N ha-1 with 6.33 t ha-1.

    Nutrient use efficiency (NUE) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as affected by NPK fertilization · 2022

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    The 46 N and 30 kg K ha−1 treatment produced a high grain yield of 4392 kg ha−1, versus 1041 in the control.

    Nutrient uptake, use efficiency and productivity of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as affected by nitrogen and potassium fertilizer in Keddida Gamela Woreda, Southern Ethiopia · 2021 · compared with control

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    wheat numbe r of tillers increased with potassium treatment.

    EFFECT OF POTASSIUM APPLICATION ON CROP YIELDS UNDER WHEAT- RICE SYSTEM · 2007

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. positive
    Increasing potassium significantly increased fertile tillers.

    Growth and yield response of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties to different potassium levels · 2008

    Same directionCited by this paper

  5. positive
    Split application of potassium at 80 kg K2O ha(-1) was superior to single basal application for wheat grain yield (43.20 q ha(-1)).

    Impact of method of application and concentration of potassium on yield of wheat. · 2014 · compared with single basal application

    Same directionCited by this paper

  6. positive
    Zn and K2O fertilizers significantly increased grain number, spike length, thousand-grain weight, grain yield and harvest index.

    Zinc and Potassium Fertilizer Synergizes Plant Nutrient Availability and Affects Growth, Yield, and Quality of Wheat Genotypes · 2023

    Same directionCites this paper

  7. negative
    NK reduced yield to near the unfertilized control level.

    Effects of Long-Term Fertilization on Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics and Grain Yield in Winter Wheat · 2004 · compared with no fertilizer

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nano-N with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

248 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.