Paper · 2006 · Horticultural Science and Technology

Effects of Pruning Time and Defruiting of Satsuma Mandarin Tree with Off-Year Growth on the Flowering and Quality during Next Years

Yong-Ho Kim; Il-Rae Rno; Sang-Wook Koh; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

20 years old ‘Okitsu wase’ (Citrus unshiu Marc.) were treated of 1)pruning in autumn, 2)pruning in autumn + partial and all defruiting of secondary scaffold branches on June, 3)pruning in spring, 4)pruning in spring + partial and all defruiting of secondary scaffold branches on June and 5)control. Floral leaf ratio was very high in all treatments in 2000 as expected, but there were no significant difference among the treatments. In 2001, floral leaf ratio was very low in all treatments as expected off year, and there were no significant difference among the treatments. Yield changes rate for the year were 3.1, 9.3, 12.9, 21.0, and 25.2% in pruning in autumn + partial and all defruiting of secondary scaffold branches on June, pruning in spring + partial and all defruiting of secondary scaffold branches on June, pruning in autumn + no defruiting, control and pruning in spring + no defruiting, respectively, resulted very low tendency in order of this treatments. The results indicated that alternate bearing phenomenon could be reduced by pruning and defruiting method. There was a little higher tendency of soluble solid content in spring pruning or defruiting plot of secondary scaffold branches on June compared to other treatments and significant difference among treatments in 2000, but no significant difference among treatments in 2001. Acidity was a little lower in spring pruning+partial and all defruiting on June compared to other treatments in 2000, but there were no significant difference among treatments in 2001.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Floral leaf ratio did not differ significantly among treatments in 2000.

Taxon
Satsuma Mandarin TreeCitrus unshiut0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
Floral leaf ratioe0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus unshiu
Citrus unshiu · TaxonBatholith ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Floral leaf ratio was very high in all treatments in 2000 as expected, but there were no significant difference among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Satsuma Mandarin Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Floral leaf ratio did not differ significantly among treatments in 2001.

Taxon
Satsuma Mandarin TreeCitrus unshiut0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
floral leaf ratioe0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus unshiu
Citrus unshiu · TaxonBatholith ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2001, floral leaf ratio was very low in all treatments as expected off year, and there were no significant difference among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Satsuma Mandarin Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield change rates were lowest with autumn pruning plus defruiting, at 3.1%.

Taxon
Satsuma Mandarin TreeCitrus unshiut0
Treatment
pruning in autumn + partial and all defruiting of secondary scaffold branches on Junee0
Outcome
Yield changes ratee0
Value
3.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus unshiu
Citrus unshiu · TaxonBatholith ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield changes rate for the year were 3.1, 9.3, 12.9, 21.0, and 25.2% in pruning in autumn + partial and all defruiting of secondary scaffold branches on June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Satsuma Mandarin Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning and defruiting could reduce alternate bearing.

Taxon
Satsuma Mandarin TreeCitrus unshiut0
Treatment
pruning and defruiting methode0
Outcome
alternate bearing phenomenone0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus unshiu
Citrus unshiu · TaxonBatholith ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alternate bearing phenomenon could be reduced by pruning and defruiting method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Satsuma Mandarin Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring pruning or June defruiting tended to raise soluble solids in 2000.

Taxon
Satsuma Mandarin TreeCitrus unshiut0
Treatment
spring pruning or defruiting plot of secondary scaffold branches on Junee0
Outcome
soluble solid contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus unshiu
Citrus unshiu · TaxonBatholith ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a little higher tendency of soluble solid content in spring pruning or defruiting plot of secondary scaffold branches on June compared to other treatments and significant difference among treatments in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Satsuma Mandarin Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit acidity was somewhat lower after spring pruning plus June defruiting in 2000.

Taxon
Satsuma Mandarin TreeCitrus unshiut0
Treatment
spring pruning+partial and all defruiting on Junee0
Outcome
Aciditye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus unshiu
Citrus unshiu · TaxonBatholith ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acidity was a little lower in spring pruning+partial and all defruiting on June compared to other treatments in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Satsuma Mandarin Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Citrus unshiu (satsuma mandarin)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.