Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Evaluation of Different Insecticides against Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera) in Lentil

S.A. Hakeem; R.A. Wani; Jahangeer A. Baba; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in the field to evaluate comparative efficacy of four insecticides viz. Dursban (Chloropyriphos 20 EC), Rogar (Dimethoate 30 EC), Curacron (Profenophos), and Tracer (Spinosad) along with untreated check against Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) on Lentil (Masoor) crop. The crop was sprayed with insecticides at Pod formation stage. Highly significant differences were observed among insecticides which has a varying degree of control in respect of decreased larval pest population and pod damage, whereas seed yield increased. Tracer was the most effective insecticide in reducing the population of Pod borer and decreasing maximum pod damage, followed by Dursban and Rogar. Curacron was found to be the least effective insecticide under this study. The maximum increase in seed yield per hectare was obtained with Tracer, whereas Rogar resulted minimum increase in seed yield over control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The four insecticides decreased larval pest population and pod damage compared with untreated check, with significant differences.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
four insecticidese0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
larval pest population and pod damagee1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four insecticides viz. Dursban (Chloropyriphos 20 EC), Rogar (Dimethoate 30 EC), Curacron (Profenophos), and Tracer (Spinosad) along with untreated check against Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) on Lentil (Masoor) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highly significant differences were observed among insecticides which has a varying degree of control in respect of decreased larval pest population and pod damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four insecticides increased seed yield compared with untreated check.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
four insecticidese0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four insecticides viz. Dursban (Chloropyriphos 20 EC), Rogar (Dimethoate 30 EC), Curacron (Profenophos), and Tracer (Spinosad) along with untreated check against Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) on Lentil (Masoor) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas seed yield increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tracer was the most effective insecticide in reducing pod borer population and pod damage, followed by Dursban and Rogar.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Tracere2
Interactor
Pod borere2pest
Outcome
most effective insecticide in reducing the population of Pod borere2
Direction
reducinge2
Comparator
Dursban and Rogare2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four insecticides viz. Dursban (Chloropyriphos 20 EC), Rogar (Dimethoate 30 EC), Curacron (Profenophos), and Tracer (Spinosad) along with untreated check against Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) on Lentil (Masoor) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–295 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tracer was the most effective insecticide in reducing the population of Pod borer and decreasing maximum pod damage, followed by Dursban and Rogar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tracer gave the maximum increase in lentil seed yield per hectare over control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Tracere4
Outcome
maximum increase in seed yield per hectaree4
Direction
increasee4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four insecticides viz. Dursban (Chloropyriphos 20 EC), Rogar (Dimethoate 30 EC), Curacron (Profenophos), and Tracer (Spinosad) along with untreated check against Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) on Lentil (Masoor) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–295 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum increase in seed yield per hectare was obtained with Tracer, whereas Rogar resulted minimum increase in seed yield over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rogar gave the minimum increase in lentil seed yield over control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Rogare4
Outcome
minimum increase in seed yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four insecticides viz. Dursban (Chloropyriphos 20 EC), Rogar (Dimethoate 30 EC), Curacron (Profenophos), and Tracer (Spinosad) along with untreated check against Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) on Lentil (Masoor) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–295 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum increase in seed yield per hectare was obtained with Tracer, whereas Rogar resulted minimum increase in seed yield over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curacron was the least effective insecticide against pod borer.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Curacrone3
Outcome
least effective insecticidee3
Direction
least effectivee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four insecticides viz. Dursban (Chloropyriphos 20 EC), Rogar (Dimethoate 30 EC), Curacron (Profenophos), and Tracer (Spinosad) along with untreated check against Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) on Lentil (Masoor) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–295 · show in text ↑
e3

“Curacron was found to be the least effective insecticide under this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–776 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.