Paper · 2018 · Journal of Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Microbial Augmentation for Enhancing Lentil and Field Pea Production in Agricultural Fields

Shashi Kant Yadav; Manikant Tripathi; Shailendra Kumar

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract Pulses are healthy, nutritious and rich in protein content and their production promote sustainable agriculture. In this study, different pulses yield were checked under field level trials augmented with microbes plus pesticide under control agro-climatic conditions. Demonstration yield of pulses were calculated and compared with farmers’ practices. This study was conducted for the production year 2015- 16. The maximum production was observed in lentil (14.0 q/ha) followed by field pea (12.7 q/ha), respectively under control conditions. Front line demonstration experiments results revealed the maximum 44.3% (lentil) and 36.6% (field pea) higher production of pulses over the farmers practice. The increased pulses yield employing demonstrated technology over farmers’ field practices revealed that the addition of microbes, pesticides, and control of agro-climatic factors, contribute the higher pulses production. Keywords: Agro-climatic factors; Biofertilizer, FLD; Microorganism; Pulses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control lentil production reached 14.0 q/ha.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.0 q/hae0
Qualifier
control conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum production was observed in lentil (14.0 q/ha) followed by field pea (12.7 q/ha), respectively under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–550 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control field pea production was 12.7 q/ha.

Taxon
field peae0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
12.7 q/hae0
Qualifier
control conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum production was observed in lentil (14.0 q/ha) followed by field pea (12.7 q/ha), respectively under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil production under the demonstration was 44.3% above farmer practice.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
addition of microbes, pesticides, and control of agro-climatic factorse1
Outcome
production of pulsese0
Direction
highere0
Value
44.3%e0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Front line demonstration experiments results revealed the maximum 44.3% (lentil) and 36.6% (field pea) higher production of pulses over the farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–708 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition of microbes, pesticides, and control of agro-climatic factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field pea production under the demonstration was 36.6% above farmer practice.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
addition of microbes, pesticides, and control of agro-climatic factorse1
Outcome
production of pulsese0
Direction
highere0
Value
36.6%e0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Verbatim

e0

“Front line demonstration experiments results revealed the maximum 44.3% (lentil) and 36.6% (field pea) higher production of pulses over the farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–708 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition of microbes, pesticides, and control of agro-climatic factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–889 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

127 papers: 108 positive, 19 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

insecticide · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.