Paper · 2011 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

INFLUENCE OF SOIL TYPE AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY

Andrija Kristek; Suzana Kristek; Suzana Kristek; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

In 2009 and 2010 we studied effect of nitrogen fertilization on the yield values on two soil types of different physical and chemical properties. Nitrogen was applied in autumn as a pre-sowing treatment on the basis of Nmin supplies in the soil, and as a top dressing. The obtained results showed significantly higher root and sugar yield values on the T-2 soil of better quality in the second year of the study. Effects of urea treatment in basic fertilization on the root and sugar yield values depended on the season, soil quality and total amount of the nitrogen added. In wet 2010 on barren T-1 soil and in dry 2009 on fertile T-2 soil with the variant N-0 (no top dressing application), nitrogen treatment in autumn (G-46) induced significant increase in the root and sugar yield values. On T-1 soil the highest root yield and sugar yield (9.54 tha-1) values were obtained with the variant G-46 even with no nitrogen application in the growing season (N-0), whilst on T-2 soil with no nitrogen application in autumn (G-0) and with top dressing up to 13.5 kgha-1N that significantly increased results in production, i.e. obtained sugar yield was 11.48 tha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Better-quality T-2 soil had significantly higher root yield in the second study year.

Outcome
roote0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
second year of the studye0
Setting
T-2 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher root and sugar yield values on the T-2 soil of better quality in the second year of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Better-quality T-2 soil had significantly higher sugar yield in the second study year.

Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
second year of the studye0
Setting
T-2 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher root and sugar yield values on the T-2 soil of better quality in the second year of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn nitrogen treatment increased root yield significantly under the stated wet T-1 and dry T-2 conditions without top dressing.

Treatment
nitrogen treatment in autumn (G-46)e0
Outcome
roote0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
N-0e0
Setting
T-1 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wet 2010 on barren T-1 soil and in dry 2009 on fertile T-2 soil with the variant N-0 (no top dressing application), nitrogen treatment in autumn (G-46) induced significant increase in the root and sugar yield values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn nitrogen treatment increased sugar yield significantly under the stated wet T-1 and dry T-2 conditions without top dressing.

Treatment
nitrogen treatment in autumn (G-46)e0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
N-0e0
Setting
T-2 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wet 2010 on barren T-1 soil and in dry 2009 on fertile T-2 soil with the variant N-0 (no top dressing application), nitrogen treatment in autumn (G-46) induced significant increase in the root and sugar yield values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On T-1 soil, G-46 without in-season nitrogen gave the highest root yield.

Treatment
variant G-46e0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
T-1 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On T-1 soil the highest root yield and sugar yield (9.54 tha-1) values were obtained with the variant G-46 even with no nitrogen application in the growing season (N-0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On T-1 soil, G-46 without in-season nitrogen gave the highest sugar yield of 9.54 tha-1.

Treatment
variant G-46e0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.54 tha-1e0
Setting
T-1 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On T-1 soil the highest root yield and sugar yield (9.54 tha-1) values were obtained with the variant G-46 even with no nitrogen application in the growing season (N-0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

On T-2 soil, no autumn nitrogen and top dressing up to 13.5 kgha-1N produced significantly higher sugar yield of 11.48 tha-1.

Treatment
top dressing up to 13.5 kgha-1Ne0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.48 tha-1e0
Comparator
G-0e0
Setting
T-2 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on T-2 soil with no nitrogen application in autumn (G-0) and with top dressing up to 13.5 kgha-1N that significantly increased results in production, i.e. obtained sugar yield was 11.48 tha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 97 positive, 11 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.