Paper · 2017 · Foods

Effect on Quality Characteristics of Tomatoes Grown Under Well-Watered and Drought Stress Conditions

Warinporn Klunklin; Geoffrey Savage

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
143
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tomatoes are one of the most nutritionally and economically important crops in New Zealand and around the world. Tomatoes require large amounts of water to grow well and are adversely affected by drought stress. However, few studies have evaluated the physicochemical characteristics of commercial tomatoes grown under water stress conditions. Four tomato cultivars (Incas, Marmande, Scoresby Dwarf, and Window Box Red) were grown in a greenhouse under well-watered and drought stress conditions and the tomatoes were harvested when ripe. The physicochemical properties and antioxidant contents of the fruits were compared. There were significant differences between cultivars in quality characteristics—such as dry matter, total soluble solids, and pH parameters—but there were no differences in the quality characteristics between the two treatments of the fruits (p > 0.05); however, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the antioxidant compositions (lycopene, total phenolics, and flavonoids) and antioxidant activities (DPPH and ABTS) of the fruits of both cultivars and treatments. Overall, these results indicated that tomatoes increased their bioactive compounds without changing any quality characteristics when exposed to water stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in dry matter, soluble solids and pH.

Outcome
dry matter, total soluble solids, and pH parameterse0
Comparator
cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences between cultivars in quality characteristics—such as dry matter, total soluble solids, and pH parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water treatments did not significantly differ in fruit quality characteristics.

Treatment
drought stress conditionse1
Outcome
quality characteristicse0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
two treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences in the quality characteristics between the two treatments of the fruits (p > 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four tomato cultivars (Incas, Marmande, Scoresby Dwarf, and Window Box Red) were grown in a greenhouse under well-watered and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–495 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit antioxidant composition differed significantly by cultivar and treatment.

Outcome
antioxidant compositions (lycopene, total phenolics, and flavonoids)e0
Comparator
cultivars and treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences (p < 0.05) in the antioxidant compositions (lycopene, total phenolics, and flavonoids) and antioxidant activities (DPPH and ABTS) of the fruits of both cultivars and treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit antioxidant activity differed significantly by cultivar and treatment.

Outcome
antioxidant activities (DPPH and ABTS)e0
Comparator
cultivars and treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences (p < 0.05) in the antioxidant compositions (lycopene, total phenolics, and flavonoids) and antioxidant activities (DPPH and ABTS) of the fruits of both cultivars and treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato bioactive compounds increased under water stress.

Treatment
water stress conditionse0
Outcome
bioactive compoundse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomatoes increased their bioactive compounds without changing any quality characteristics when exposed to water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1267 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

drought · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.