Paper · 2005 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SOIL TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON NODULATION AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN

Jug, D.; Blažinkov, Mihaela; Redžepović, S.; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The primary soil tillage for different crops in Croatia is generally based on mouldboard ploughing which is the most expensive for crops production. Negative effects due to frequent passes by equipment and machines (deterioration of soil structure, soil compaction, lower biogenity and soil tilth), together with negative economical and energetical costs, can be lowered and avoided by introduction of reduced soil tillage or direct drilling (No-tillage). Accordingly, the main goal of this research was to determine effects of conventional and reduced soil tillage systems on yield components and nodulation ability of nitrogen fixing bacteria in soybean crop. The research was established at chernozem soil type of northern Baranja as monofactorial completely randomized block design in four repetitions. The soil tillage variants were as follows: CT) Conventional Tillage (primary soil tillage by moldboard ploughing at 25-30 cm depth), DH) Multiple Diskharrowing at 10-15 cm as primary tillage, and NT) No-tillage system. Results show significantly lower plant density, mass of 1000 grains and grain yield at variants with reduced soil tillage in both investigation years. However, reduced tillage systems had positive trend on nitrogen-fixing bacteria nodulation, since the highest values of number and mass of nodules per plant were recorded. This research was run during the years 2002 and 2003, the last one extremely droughty, thus it requires continuation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage significantly lowered soybean plant density, 1000-grain mass and grain yield in both years.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Treatment
reduced soil tillagee0
Outcome
plant density, mass of 1000 grains and grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results show significantly lower plant density, mass of 1000 grains and grain yield at variants with reduced soil tillage in both investigation years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage had a positive trend in nitrogen-fixing bacteria nodulation, with the highest nodule number and mass per plant.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Treatment
reduced tillage systemse0
Interactor
nitrogen-fixing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
number and mass of nodules per plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced tillage systems had positive trend on nitrogen-fixing bacteria nodulation, since the highest values of number and mass of nodules per plant were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑

tillage · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.