Paper · 2017 · THE ASIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE

Effect of plant bio-regulators on the growth, yield and physico- chemical characteristics of onion (Allium cepa L.)

SANJAY KUMAR; SUTANU MAJI; KAMAL RAM MEENA

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This experiment was held to study about the efficacy of concentration of plant bio regulators on vegetative growth, yield and quality characters of onion cv. NHRDF-RED-2 under Lucknow subtropical condition having dry climate and high pH soil (8.2). The experiment comprised of 13 treatments [Control (water spray), GA 3 @ 50, 100 ppm, 150 ppm; NAA @ 50 ppm, 100 ppm, 150 ppm and combination of GA 3 and NAA] laid out in the Randomized Block Design with three replications. The observations revealed that the application of T 11 [GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppm] was better for improvement of growth i.e. plant height (76.50 cm), number of leaves (8.27), length of leaves (60.60) and basal diameter (2.05 cm) at 90 DAT. It also recorded the highest bulb yield (60.34 t/ha), fresh weight (90.51 g), dry weight (10.89 g), diameter (6.87 and 6.87 cm equatorial and polar, respectively) of onion bulb. Similarly, chemical properties like TSS (12.03 0 B) and pH (6.99) was found better under treatment T 11 (GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppm) followed by T 9 (GA 3 @ 50 ppm + NAA @ 150 ppm). Thus, the study suggested that combined application of bio regulators (GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppm) may be followed to get better growth, yield and quality of onion cv. NHRDF-RED-2 under drier subtropical climate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave plant height of 76.50 cm at 90 DAT.

Treatment
GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
bettere0
Value
76.50 cme0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the application of T 11 [GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppm] was better for improvement of growth i.e. plant height (76.50 cm), number of leaves (8.27), length of leaves (60.60) and basal diameter (2.05 cm) at 90 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave 8.27 leaves at 90 DAT.

Treatment
GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppme0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
bettere0
Value
8.27e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the application of T 11 [GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppm] was better for improvement of growth i.e. plant height (76.50 cm), number of leaves (8.27), length of leaves (60.60) and basal diameter (2.05 cm) at 90 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave leaf length of 60.60 at 90 DAT.

Treatment
GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppme0
Outcome
length of leavese0
Direction
bettere0
Value
60.60e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the application of T 11 [GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppm] was better for improvement of growth i.e. plant height (76.50 cm), number of leaves (8.27), length of leaves (60.60) and basal diameter (2.05 cm) at 90 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave basal diameter of 2.05 cm at 90 DAT.

Treatment
GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppme0
Outcome
basal diametere0
Direction
bettere0
Value
2.05 cme0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the application of T 11 [GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppm] was better for improvement of growth i.e. plant height (76.50 cm), number of leaves (8.27), length of leaves (60.60) and basal diameter (2.05 cm) at 90 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave the highest bulb yield, 60.34 t/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
60.34 t/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also recorded the highest bulb yield (60.34 t/ha), fresh weight (90.51 g), dry weight (10.89 g), diameter (6.87 and 6.87 cm equatorial and polar, respectively) of onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave bulb fresh weight of 90.51 g.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
90.51 ge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also recorded the highest bulb yield (60.34 t/ha), fresh weight (90.51 g), dry weight (10.89 g), diameter (6.87 and 6.87 cm equatorial and polar, respectively) of onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave bulb dry weight of 10.89 g.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.89 ge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also recorded the highest bulb yield (60.34 t/ha), fresh weight (90.51 g), dry weight (10.89 g), diameter (6.87 and 6.87 cm equatorial and polar, respectively) of onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave equatorial and polar bulb diameter of 6.87 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
diametere0
Value
6.87 and 6.87 cme0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diameter (6.87 and 6.87 cm equatorial and polar, respectively) of onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave better TSS of 12.03 0 B.

Treatment
GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppme0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
bettere0
Value
12.03 0 Be0
Comparator
T 9e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“chemical properties like TSS (12.03 0 B) and pH (6.99) was found better under treatment T 11 (GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppm) followed by T 9 (GA 3 @ 50 ppm + NAA @ 150 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave better pH of 6.99.

Treatment
GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppme0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
bettere0
Value
6.99e0
Comparator
T 9e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“chemical properties like TSS (12.03 0 B) and pH (6.99) was found better under treatment T 11 (GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppm) followed by T 9 (GA 3 @ 50 ppm + NAA @ 150 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–115 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined GA3 and NAA for onion growth, yield and quality under dry subtropical climate.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Material
NHRDF-RED-2e0
Treatment
GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppme0
Outcome
better growth, yield and qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of bio regulators (GA 3 @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 100 ppm) may be followed to get better growth, yield and quality of onion cv. NHRDF-RED-2 under drier subtropical climate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1297 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Gibberellic acid · soil: chemistry · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.