Paper · 2017 · Contemporary Agriculture

Effect of the Duration of Liquid Nitrogen Storage on the Regrowth of Blackberry Cryopreserved by Droplet Vitrification

Tatjana Vujović; Đurđina Ružić; Radosav Cerović

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Summary In vitro shoot tips of the blackberry cultivar ‘Čačanska Bestrna’ were cryopreserved using the droplet vitrification technique. Upon loading (30 min) in a solution of 1.9 M glycerol and 0.5 M sucrose, the explants were dehydrated for 40 min on ice with the PVS A3 vitrification solution (glycerol 37.5%, dimethyl sulfoxide 15%, ethylene glycol 15% and sucrose 22.5%) and for 40 min at room temperature with the PVS3 solution (glycerol 50% and sucrose 50%). They were subsequently frozen in individual microdroplets of vitrification solution, by direct immersion in liquid nitrogen (LN), and kept therein for 2, 4, 8 and 24 h. The explant rewarming was performed in an unloading solution (0.8 M sucrose) for 30 min at room temperature. The duration of LN exposure did not exert significant effects on the survival and regrowth of explants in both types of vitrification solutions. The survival and regrowth of cryopreserved shoot tips dehydrated with PVS3 solution ranged between 90–95% and 80–90%, respectively. However, dehydration with PVS A3 resulted in a lower survival rate (80–90%) and a considerably lower regrowth rate (55–65%) of explants. Monitoring the shoots regenerated in the in vitro culture revealed their normal capacity for multiplication and rooting in comparison with the controls, which fully confirms the purpose of cryopreservation in the long-term preservation of plant material.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Duration of liquid nitrogen exposure did not significantly affect survival and regrowth of blackberry explants.

Taxon
BlackberryRubust0
Material
‘Čačanska Bestrna’e1
Treatment
duration of LN exposuree2
Outcome
survival and regrowth of explantse2
Direction
did not exert significant effectse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“shoot tips of the blackberry cultivar ‘Čačanska Bestrna’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“The duration of LN exposure did not exert significant effects on the survival and regrowth of explants in both types of vitrification solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Regrowth of Blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival of cryopreserved blackberry shoot tips dehydrated with PVS3 solution was 90–95%.

Taxon
BlackberryRubust0
Organ / stage
shoot tipse3
Treatment
dehydrated with PVS3 solutione3
Outcome
survivale3
Direction
ranged betweene3
Value
90–95%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The survival and regrowth of cryopreserved shoot tips dehydrated with PVS3 solution ranged between 90–95% and 80–90%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Regrowth of Blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regrowth of cryopreserved blackberry shoot tips dehydrated with PVS3 solution was 80–90%.

Taxon
BlackberryRubust0
Organ / stage
shoot tipse3
Treatment
dehydrated with PVS3 solutione3
Outcome
regrowthe3
Direction
ranged betweene3
Value
80–90%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The survival and regrowth of cryopreserved shoot tips dehydrated with PVS3 solution ranged between 90–95% and 80–90%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Regrowth of Blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydration with PVS A3 lowered survival of blackberry explants to 80–90%, compared with PVS3.

Taxon
BlackberryRubust0
Organ / stage
explantse4
Treatment
dehydration with PVS A3e4
Outcome
survival ratee4
Direction
resulted in a lowere4
Value
80–90%e4
Comparator
PVS3 solutione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“However, dehydration with PVS A3 resulted in a lower survival rate (80–90%) and a considerably lower regrowth rate (55–65%) of explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1155 · show in text ↑
e3

“The survival and regrowth of cryopreserved shoot tips dehydrated with PVS3 solution ranged between 90–95% and 80–90%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Regrowth of Blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydration with PVS A3 lowered regrowth of blackberry explants to 55–65%, compared with PVS3.

Taxon
BlackberryRubust0
Organ / stage
explantse4
Treatment
dehydration with PVS A3e4
Outcome
regrowth ratee4
Direction
considerably lowere4
Value
55–65%e4
Comparator
PVS3 solutione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“However, dehydration with PVS A3 resulted in a lower survival rate (80–90%) and a considerably lower regrowth rate (55–65%) of explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1155 · show in text ↑
e3

“The survival and regrowth of cryopreserved shoot tips dehydrated with PVS3 solution ranged between 90–95% and 80–90%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Regrowth of Blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerated blackberry shoots showed normal capacity for multiplication and rooting, similar to controls.

Taxon
BlackberryRubust0
Outcome
capacity for multiplication and rootinge5
Qualifier
normal capacitye5
Comparator
controlse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Monitoring the shoots regenerated in the in vitro culture revealed their normal capacity for multiplication and rooting in comparison with the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“Regrowth of Blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑

drought · survival · Rubus (bramble)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · growth · Rubus (bramble)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.