Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dehydration with PVS A3 lowered survival of blackberry explants to 80–90%, compared with PVS3.

A claim from Effect of the Duration of Liquid Nitrogen Storage on the Regrowth of Blackberry Cryopreserved by Droplet Vitrification · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydration with PVS A3 lowered survival of blackberry explants to 80–90%, compared with PVS3.

Taxon
BlackberryRubust0
Organ / stage
explantse4
Treatment
dehydration with PVS A3e4
Outcome
survival ratee4
Direction
resulted in a lowere4
Value
80–90%e4
Comparator
PVS3 solutione3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“However, dehydration with PVS A3 resulted in a lower survival rate (80–90%) and a considerably lower regrowth rate (55–65%) of explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1155
e3

“The survival and regrowth of cryopreserved shoot tips dehydrated with PVS3 solution ranged between 90–95% and 80–90%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1018
t0

“Regrowth of Blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79

Title

Effect of the Duration of Liquid Nitrogen Storage on the Regrowth of Blackberry Cryopreserved by Droplet Vitrification

Tatjana Vujović; Đurđina Ružić; Radosav Cerović Contemporary Agriculture 2017. doi:10.1515/contagri-2017-0008

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-4845ed0fb98e96f22383095b80f11e18478e9edbcc5ec8d8b97d70268b6eb5c7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

drought · survival · Rubus (bramble)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.