Paper · 2017 · The Agriculturists

Effect of Polyethylene Glycol Induced Water Stress on Germination and Seedling Growth of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

MS Rana; MA Hasan; MM Bahadur; et al.

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The performance of twenty wheat genotypes under Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) induced water stress during germination and early seedling growth stages were tested under three levels of water potential i) Control (Tap water), ii) -2 bars and iii) -4 bar at the Crop Physiology and Ecology Laboratory of Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur during September 2014 to October 2014. Rate of germination and vigor index of all wheat genotypes were delayed with the increment of water stress induced by PEG. Shoot and root lengths and seedling dry weight of 10 days old seedlings were found to be reduced due to the increment of water stress. However, the degree of reduction of these parameters with the increment of water stress was not similar for all wheat genotypes. Stress tolerance index (STI) based on seedling dry weight indicated a wide difference in stress tolerance among the wheat genotypes. At moderate water deficit stress, BARI Gom 25, E 34, E 28 and BAW 1170 showed more stress tolerance and the wheat genotypes- Sourav, E 23 and BAW 1140 showed greater stress sensitivity than the other wheat genotypes. At higher water deficit stress, BARI Gom 25, BARI Gom 28, E 28 and BAW 1170 showed more stress tolerance and the wheat genotypes- Satabdi, Sourav, BARI Gom 26, E 23, E 38, E 24, BAW 1163, BAW 1140 and BAW 1151 showed greater stress sensitivity than the others. Considering both moderate and high water deficit stress, BARI Gom 25, E 28 and BAW 1170 were found as tolerant and Sourav, E 23 and BAW 1140 were found as water deficit stress sensitive wheat genotypes. The Agriculturists 2017; 15(1) 81-91

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing PEG water stress delayed wheat germination rate and vigor index.

Treatment
water stress induced by PEGe0
Outcome
Rate of germination and vigor indexe0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
Control (Tap water)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rate of germination and vigor index of all wheat genotypes were delayed with the increment of water stress induced by PEG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–525 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control (Tap water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing water stress reduced wheat shoot and root lengths and seedling dry weight.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Shoot and root lengths and seedling dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
10 days old seedlingse0
Comparator
Control (Tap water)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot and root lengths and seedling dry weight of 10 days old seedlings were found to be reduced due to the increment of water stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–660 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control (Tap water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The degree of seedling trait reduction differed among wheat genotypes.

Outcome
degree of reduction of these parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the degree of reduction of these parameters with the increment of water stress was not similar for all wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling dry weight stress tolerance index differed widely among wheat genotypes.

Outcome
wide difference in stress tolerancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stress tolerance index (STI) based on seedling dry weight indicated a wide difference in stress tolerance among the wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–922 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At moderate deficit, BARI Gom 25, E 34, E 28 and BAW 1170 showed greater tolerance than other wheat genotypes.

Material
BARI Gom 25, E 34, E 28 and BAW 1170e0
Treatment
moderate water deficit stresse0
Outcome
stress tolerancee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the other wheat genotypese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At moderate water deficit stress, BARI Gom 25, E 34, E 28 and BAW 1170 showed more stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1022 · show in text ↑
e1

“than the other wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At moderate deficit, Sourav, E 23 and BAW 1140 showed greater sensitivity than other wheat genotypes.

Material
Sourav, E 23 and BAW 1140e0
Treatment
moderate water deficit stresse1
Outcome
stress sensitivitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
the other wheat genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sourav, E 23 and BAW 1140 showed greater stress sensitivity than the other wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“At moderate water deficit stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher deficit, BARI Gom 25, BARI Gom 28, E 28 and BAW 1170 showed more tolerance.

Material
BARI Gom 25, BARI Gom 28, E 28 and BAW 1170e0
Treatment
higher water deficit stresse0
Outcome
stress tolerancee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the otherse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher water deficit stress, BARI Gom 25, BARI Gom 28, E 28 and BAW 1170 showed more stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1244 · show in text ↑
e1

“than the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher deficit, nine named wheat genotypes showed greater sensitivity than others.

Material
Satabdi, Sourav, BARI Gom 26, E 23, E 38, E 24, BAW 1163, BAW 1140 and BAW 1151e0
Treatment
higher water deficit stresse1
Outcome
stress sensitivitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Satabdi, Sourav, BARI Gom 26, E 23, E 38, E 24, BAW 1163, BAW 1140 and BAW 1151 showed greater stress sensitivity than the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1399 · show in text ↑
e1

“At higher water deficit stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across both stress levels, BARI Gom 25, E 28 and BAW 1170 were tolerant.

Material
BARI Gom 25, E 28 and BAW 1170e0
Treatment
moderate and high water deficit stresse0
Outcome
tolerante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considering both moderate and high water deficit stress, BARI Gom 25, E 28 and BAW 1170 were found as tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across both stress levels, Sourav, E 23 and BAW 1140 were water deficit sensitive.

Material
Sourav, E 23 and BAW 1140e0
Treatment
moderate and high water deficit stresse1
Outcome
water deficit stress sensitivee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sourav, E 23 and BAW 1140 were found as water deficit stress sensitive wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1602 · show in text ↑
e1

“Considering both moderate and high water deficit stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene glycol) · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 6 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.