Abstract
Abstract In this study, six different irrigation treatments were applied to an olive orchard using the drip irrigation method. Five of these were arranged according to 25% (S 0.25 ), 50% (S 0.50 ), 75% (S 0.75 ), 100% (S 1.00 ) and 125% (S 1.25 ) of the evaporation in 5 days of a class ‘A’ evaporation pan, and one control (S C ) was arranged so as to bring the reducing moisture at a soil depth of 0–90 cm to field capacity. Yield values were not affected by the irrigation treatment ( p > 0.05). In contrast, 100‐fruit weight, pulp ratio, hardness moisture, oil, reducing sugar content and bitterness were affected by irrigation ( p < 0.05). Generally, an increase in the amount of irrigation water given in the study was accompanied by a fall in ripeness index values, a rise in moisture content, and a reduction in the oil content of fruit. The highest content of reducing sugar was obtained from S 0.25 , generally being lower with increase in the water applied. The findings show that application of 25% of the evaporation of a class ‘A’ evaporation pan (treatment S 0.25 ) can be recommended for cv. Memecik. Application of this recommendation can achieve a 72% saving in water and make a significant contribution to the conservation of limited water resources. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation treatment did not affect olive yield.
- Taxon
- Olive Trees
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- irrigation treatmente1
- Outcome
- Yield valuese1
- Direction
- not affectede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Olive Trees”
e1“Yield values were not affected by the irrigation treatment ( p > 0.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation affected 100-fruit weight and pulp ratio.
- Taxon
- Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- irrigatione1
- Outcome
- fruit weight, pulp ratioe1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Olive Trees”
e1“fruit weight, pulp ratio, hardness moisture, oil, reducing sugar content and bitterness were affected by irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation affected hardness, moisture and oil.
- Taxon
- Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- irrigatione1
- Outcome
- hardness moisture, oile1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Olive Trees”
e1“fruit weight, pulp ratio, hardness moisture, oil, reducing sugar content and bitterness were affected by irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation affected reducing sugar content and bitterness.
- Taxon
- Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- irrigatione1
- Outcome
- reducing sugar content and bitternesse1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Olive Trees”
e1“fruit weight, pulp ratio, hardness moisture, oil, reducing sugar content and bitterness were affected by irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
More irrigation water was accompanied by a fall in ripeness index values.
- Taxon
- Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- increase in the amount of irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- ripeness index valuese1
- Direction
- falle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Olive Trees”
e1“an increase in the amount of irrigation water given in the study was accompanied by a fall in ripeness index values, a rise in moisture content, and a reduction in the oil content of fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
More irrigation water was accompanied by a rise in moisture content of fruit.
- Taxon
- Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- increase in the amount of irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- moisture contente1
- Direction
- risee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Olive Trees”
e1“an increase in the amount of irrigation water given in the study was accompanied by a fall in ripeness index values, a rise in moisture content, and a reduction in the oil content of fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
More irrigation water was accompanied by a reduction in fruit oil content.
- Taxon
- Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- increase in the amount of irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- oil contente1
- Direction
- reductione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Olive Trees”
e1“an increase in the amount of irrigation water given in the study was accompanied by a fall in ripeness index values, a rise in moisture content, and a reduction in the oil content of fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
The S 0.25 treatment gave the highest reducing sugar content.
- Taxon
- Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- S 0.25e1
- Outcome
- content of reducing sugare1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Olive Trees”
e1“The highest content of reducing sugar was obtained from S 0.25”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 25% of class A pan evaporation can be recommended for cv. Memecik.
- Taxon
- Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
- Material
- Memecike1
- Outcome
- application of 25% of the evaporation of a class ‘A’ evaporation pane1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Olive Trees”
e1“The findings show that application of 25% of the evaporation of a class ‘A’ evaporation pan (treatment S 0.25 ) can be recommended for cv. Memecik”
Claim · model-written summary
The recommended irrigation can save 72% of water.
- Taxon
- Olive TreesOlea europaeat0
- Outcome
- saving in watere1
- Value
- 72%e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Olive Trees”
e1“can achieve a 72% saving in water”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.