Paper · 1996 · UCL Discovery (University College London)

Effect of composted manure on soil fertility and maize (Zea mays) production. Preliminary results

Sara Marinari; Luigi Badalucco; VC De Toledo; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of composted manure utilised as an alternative fertiliser in maize forage production on soil microbial-biomass was studied. Five different field treatments (with and without atrazine) were compared: control (without fertiliser), fresh manure, composted manure, inorganic-N fertiliser (nitram), compost++nitram. Fresh and dry matter of forage biomass was determined at the end of growing season, and soil microbial C-biomass and microbial N-biomass were determined during crop cycle. A decrease on forage yield was observed in fresh manure treatment without atrazine, probably caused by strong competition for nutrient uptake among crop, weeds and micro-organisms. The addition of inorganic fertiliser did not bring any significant increase in soil N-biomass due to the high basal organic matter content of soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh manure without atrazine decreased maize forage yield, probably because of competition for nutrient uptake among crop, weeds and micro-organisms.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fresh manure treatment without atrazinee1
Interactor
weedse2weed
Second interactor
micro-organismse2other
Outcome
forage yielde1
Direction
decreasee1
Qualifier
probably caused by strong competition for nutrient uptake among crop, weeds and micro-organismse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“A decrease on forage yield was observed in fresh manure treatment without atrazine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–577 · show in text ↑
e2

“probably caused by strong competition for nutrient uptake among crop, weeds and micro-organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of inorganic fertiliser did not significantly increase soil N-biomass, owing to the high basal organic matter content of the soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
addition of inorganic fertilisere3
Outcome
soil N-biomasse3
Direction
did not bring any significant increasee3
Qualifier
due to the high basal organic matter content of soile3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“The addition of inorganic fertiliser did not bring any significant increase in soil N-biomass due to the high basal organic matter content of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–822 · show in text ↑

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 205 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.