Paper · 2017 · Revista CERES

Yield and nutritional efficiency of corn in response to rates and splits of nitrogen fertilization

Telmo Jorge Carneiro Amado; Enrique Oswin Hahn Villalba; Rafael Pivotto Bortolotto; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite its relevance, nitrogen is poorly utilized by the plants when improperly applied. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in corn in response to doses and split application of nitrogen fertilization. The experimental design was a randomized block design, with three replications. Doses of nitrogen of 0, 30, 60 and 180 kg ha-1 were applied at sowing in order to create different nutritional status of corn plants and to obtain different values of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) measured with “Greenseeker®” optical sensor. The subplots with nitrogen doses in topdressing of 0, 30, 60 and 90 kg ha-1 at V8 and a dose of 60 kg ha-1 at V12 were placed in experimental plots with doses of 0, 30, 60 and 180 kg ha-1 of nitrogen at sowing. Moreover, NUE was calculated in the experiment using agronomic indexes determined by applications of nitrogen in late topdressing (V8 and V12) and contrasted to the possible combinations at doses of 60, 90 and 120 kg ha-1 of total N applied. The results showed the occurrence of a linear relationship between nitrogen fertilizer dose and NDVI at V8 as well as at V12 stages. Late topdressing fertilizations (V12) did not cause a decrease in grain yield when combined with nitrogen fertilization at sowing, moreover resulted in higher NUE. Split the nitrogen dose showed better NUE than the combinations where nitrogen was not applied at sowing or in topdressing. The delay of nitrogen topdressing can be an alternative for the planning of the moment of the N fertilization according to the climate forecast in each region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer dose had a linear relationship with NDVI at V8.

Organ / stage
V8e0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer dosee0
Outcome
NDVIe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed the occurrence of a linear relationship between nitrogen fertilizer dose and NDVI at V8 as well as at V12 stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and nutritional efficiency of corn in response to rates and splits of nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer dose had a linear relationship with NDVI at V12.

Organ / stage
V12e0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer dosee0
Outcome
NDVIe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed the occurrence of a linear relationship between nitrogen fertilizer dose and NDVI at V8 as well as at V12 stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and nutritional efficiency of corn in response to rates and splits of nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V12 topdressing combined with sowing nitrogen did not decrease grain yield.

Treatment
Late topdressing fertilizations (V12)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not cause a decreasee0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilization at sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late topdressing fertilizations (V12) did not cause a decrease in grain yield when combined with nitrogen fertilization at sowing, moreover resulted in higher NUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and nutritional efficiency of corn in response to rates and splits of nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V12 topdressing combined with sowing nitrogen yielded higher NUE.

Treatment
Late topdressing fertilizations (V12)e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilization at sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late topdressing fertilizations (V12) did not cause a decrease in grain yield when combined with nitrogen fertilization at sowing, moreover resulted in higher NUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and nutritional efficiency of corn in response to rates and splits of nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split nitrogen application gave better NUE than schedules omitting sowing or topdressing nitrogen.

Treatment
Split the nitrogen dosee0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
the combinations where nitrogen was not applied at sowing or in topdressinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Split the nitrogen dose showed better NUE than the combinations where nitrogen was not applied at sowing or in topdressing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and nutritional efficiency of corn in response to rates and splits of nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying nitrogen topdressing was proposed as an option for scheduling fertilization around regional climate forecasts.

Outcome
The delay of nitrogen topdressing can be an alternativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The delay of nitrogen topdressing can be an alternative for the planning of the moment of the N fertilization according to the climate forecast in each region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and nutritional efficiency of corn in response to rates and splits of nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

194 papers: 142 positive, 52 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

190 papers more in this group

See all 194 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.