Paper · 2016 · PubMed

[Response of seed germination and seedling growth of Chinese fir to different light intensities].

Qing Qing Liu; Xiang Qing Ma; Yan Juan Li; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

, respectively) was investigated, and the adaptive strategy of seed germination, seedling survival, growth, morphological plasticity, biomass accumulation and allocation under different light intensities was explored in this paper. The results showed that light intensity significantly affected the germination rate, survival rate, establishment rate and germination index. Germination rate reached the maximum under 40% light intensity, while survival rate and establishment rate reached the maximum at 100% light intensity. With the light intensity decreased, the stem length increased, while the root length, cotyledon length, cotyledon thickness and euphylla number declined, and basal stem diameter had no significant difference among diffe-rent light intensities. The total biomass, root biomass, stem biomass and leaf biomass were the highest under 100% light intensity. With the light intensity decreased, the photosynthesis non-photosynthesis biomass ratio and leaf biomass ratio declined, while stem biomass ratio increased, the root to shoot ratio and root biomass ratio had no significant difference among different light intensities. Low light promoted seed germination, but seedlings grew slowly with high mortality under low light. The accumulation of biomass in stem increased the plant tolerance to low light.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity significantly affected germination rate, survival rate, establishment rate and germination index.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Outcome
germination rate, survival rate, establishment rate and germination indexe0
Direction
significantly affectede0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“light intensity significantly affected the germination rate, survival rate, establishment rate and germination index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–372 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination rate was maximal at 40% light intensity.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Treatment
40% light intensitye0
Outcome
Germination ratee0
Direction
maximume0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination rate reached the maximum under 40% light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival and establishment rates were maximal at 100% light intensity.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Treatment
100% light intensitye0
Outcome
survival rate and establishment ratee0
Direction
maximume0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“survival rate and establishment rate reached the maximum at 100% light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–524 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem length increased as light intensity declined.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Treatment
light intensity decreasede0
Outcome
stem lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“With the light intensity decreased, the stem length increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–587 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length, cotyledon length and cotyledon thickness declined as light intensity declined.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Outcome
root length, cotyledon length, cotyledon thicknesse0
Direction
declinede0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“the root length, cotyledon length, cotyledon thickness and euphylla number declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–678 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Euphylla number declined as light intensity declined.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Outcome
euphylla numbere0
Direction
declinede0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“euphylla number declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–678 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal stem diameter did not differ significantly among light intensities.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Outcome
basal stem diametere0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“basal stem diameter had no significant difference among diffe-rent light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–768 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total, root and stem biomass were highest under 100% light intensity.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Treatment
100% light intensitye0
Outcome
total biomass, root biomass, stem biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The total biomass, root biomass, stem biomass and leaf biomass were the highest under 100% light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf biomass was highest under 100% light intensity.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Treatment
100% light intensitye0
Outcome
leaf biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf biomass were the highest under 100% light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis non-photosynthesis biomass ratio and leaf biomass ratio declined with falling light intensity.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Outcome
photosynthesis non-photosynthesis biomass ratio and leaf biomass ratioe0
Direction
declinede0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“With the light intensity decreased, the photosynthesis non-photosynthesis biomass ratio and leaf biomass ratio declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–997 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem biomass ratio increased with falling light intensity.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Outcome
stem biomass ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“stem biomass ratio increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1033 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root to shoot ratio and root biomass ratio did not differ significantly among light intensities.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Outcome
root to shoot ratio and root biomass ratioe0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“the root to shoot ratio and root biomass ratio had no significant difference among different light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light promoted seed germination.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Treatment
Low lighte0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
promotede0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Low light promoted seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1182 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings grew slowly under low light.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Treatment
low lighte0
Outcome
seedlings grewe0
Direction
slowlye0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“seedlings grew slowly with high mortality under low light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling mortality was high under low light.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Treatment
low lighte0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
highe0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“high mortality under low light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1245 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed greater low-light tolerance to greater stem biomass accumulation.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
plant tolerance to low lighte0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The accumulation of biomass in stem increased the plant tolerance to low light.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1326 · show in text ↑