Abstract
ABSTRACT ‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.) harvested from trees grown on vigorous and semi-dwarfing rootstocks was stored in normal atmosphere (NA) at 8°C and 2°C, and in a controlled atmosphere (CA) 3% O2 + 5% CO 2 at 2°C for two weeks. At harvest time, the fruits differed in the measured quality parameters (firmness, soluble solids content - SSC, titratable acidity - TA) depending on the rootstock. The storage conditions and the rootstocks significantly influenced the fruit quality parameters after storage. Generally, reduced fruit firmness and TA, and higher SSC and SSC/TA ratio were observed at the end of the storage period. Among the rootstocks, the lowest soluble solids content was found in the fruit from trees on the vigorous F12/1 rootstock. The lower storage temperature decreased the SSC independently of the storage atmosphere composition. Firmer fruit was found in CA 2°C compared with the other two treatments. The greatest loss of weight was found after fruit storage in NA 8°C. The extent of fruit decay depended on the season, storage conditions and the rootstock. Storage in NA 8°C of the fruit grown on F12/1 rootstock resulted in the highest percentage of fungal decay. The best retention of the green colour of the peduncle was noted in CA 2°C. The findings on how the rootstocks affect sweet cherry fruit properties can be useful for sweet cherry breeding programmes, as well as for sweet cherry crop production and storage technologies.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Storage reduced sweet cherry fruit firmness and titratable acidity.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry
Prunus aviume0 - Material
- Reginae0
- Treatment
- storage periode2
- Outcome
- fruit firmness and TAe2
- Direction
- reducede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)”
e2“Generally, reduced fruit firmness and TA, and higher SSC and SSC/TA ratio were observed at the end of the storage period”
Claim · model-written summary
Storage increased soluble solids content and SSC/TA ratio of sweet cherry fruit.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Material
- Reginae0
- Treatment
- storage periode2
- Outcome
- SSC and SSC/TA ratioe2
- Direction
- highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)”
e2“Generally, reduced fruit firmness and TA, and higher SSC and SSC/TA ratio were observed at the end of the storage period”
Claim · model-written summary
Among rootstocks, the vigorous F12/1 rootstock gave the lowest soluble solids content in sweet cherry fruit.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Treatment
- vigorous F12/1 rootstocke3
- Outcome
- soluble solids contente3
- Direction
- loweste3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)”
e3“Among the rootstocks, the lowest soluble solids content was found in the fruit from trees on the vigorous F12/1 rootstock”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower storage temperature decreased soluble solids content independently of storage atmosphere.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Treatment
- lower storage temperaturee4
- Outcome
- SSCe4
- Direction
- decreasede4
- Qualifier
- independently of the storage atmosphere compositione4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)”
e4“The lower storage temperature decreased the SSC independently of the storage atmosphere composition”
Claim · model-written summary
Controlled atmosphere at 2°C gave firmer sweet cherry fruit than the other two storage treatments.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Treatment
- CA 2°Ce5
- Outcome
- fruit firmnesse2
- Direction
- Firmere5
- Comparator
- the other two treatmentse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)”
e2“reduced fruit firmness and TA”
e5“Firmer fruit was found in CA 2°C compared with the other two treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Storage in normal atmosphere at 8°C gave the greatest weight loss of sweet cherry fruit.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Treatment
- fruit storage in NA 8°Ce6
- Outcome
- loss of weighte6
- Direction
- greateste6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)”
e6“The greatest loss of weight was found after fruit storage in NA 8°C”
Claim · model-written summary
Storage in normal atmosphere at 8°C of fruit from F12/1 rootstock gave the highest percentage of fungal decay.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Material
- F12/1 rootstocke7
- Treatment
- Storage in NA 8°Ce7
- Outcome
- percentage of fungal decaye7
- Direction
- higheste7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)”
e7“Storage in NA 8°C of the fruit grown on F12/1 rootstock resulted in the highest percentage of fungal decay”
Claim · model-written summary
Controlled atmosphere at 2°C best retained the green colour of the sweet cherry peduncle.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Organ / stage
- pedunclee1
- Treatment
- CA 2°Ce1
- Outcome
- retention of the green colour of the pedunclee1
- Direction
- best retentione1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)”
e1“The best retention of the green colour of the peduncle was noted in CA 2°C”
Claim · model-written summary
The extent of sweet cherry fruit decay depended on season, storage conditions and rootstock.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Treatment
- storage conditionse1
- Outcome
- extent of fruit decaye1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)”
e1“The extent of fruit decay depended on the season, storage conditions and the rootstock”
Claim · model-written summary
Storage conditions and rootstocks significantly influenced sweet cherry fruit quality parameters after storage.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Treatment
- storage conditionse1
- Outcome
- fruit quality parameterse1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)”
e1“The storage conditions and the rootstocks significantly influenced the fruit quality parameters after storage”
The same questions in other papers
storage · quality: sugar starch · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →storage · disease · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →storage · quality: postharvest · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.