Paper · 2004 · HortTechnology

Quality of Modified Atmosphere Packaged `Hedelfingen' and `Lapins' Sweet Cherries

O.I. Padilla-Zakour; K.S. Tandon; J.M. Wargo

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
28
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

`Hedelfingen' and `Lapins' sweet cherries ( Prunus avium ) were stored in air or in two types of modified atmosphere (MA) bags (LifeSpan 204 and 208) at 3 °C (37.4 °F) and 90% relative humidity for 4 weeks. Various analytical and quality measurements were conducted weekly on `Hedelfingen' cherries, whereas on `Lapins' these were done initially and at the end of 4 weeks. For `Hedelfingen' cherries, there were differences in carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and oxygen (O 2 ) composition within the MA bags, depending on the bag used. This resulted in slightly better cherry quality for the bag with lower O 2 permeability (L204), which equilibrated at 4% to 5% O 2 and 7% to 8% CO 2 . For `Lapins', the two MA bags showed concentrations of 9% to 10% O 2 and 8% to 9% CO 2 and similar final fruit quality. There was a significant weight loss for the control treatments over time (6% to 13%), whereas the MA treatments showed minimal losses. A higher incidence of cracking and decay was observed in MA treatments of `Hedelfingen' but not in `Lapins'. Control cherries had significant shriveling and browning of stems; MA-stored cherries had green and healthy stems after 4 weeks. No significant differences were observed in pH, acidity, soluble solids, firmness, and hue angle among the storage treatments. MA packaged cherries seemed to maintain better color than control cherries over time. Similarly, MA cherries had better appearance and eating quality after 4 weeks when compared to control cherries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hedelfingen bag type affected carbon dioxide and oxygen composition.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Material
`Hedelfingen'e0
Treatment
MA bagse0
Outcome
carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and oxygen (O 2 ) compositione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For `Hedelfingen' cherries, there were differences in carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and oxygen (O 2 ) composition within the MA bags, depending on the bag used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L204 produced slightly better Hedelfingen quality and equilibrated to 4–5% oxygen and 7–8% carbon dioxide.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Material
L204e0
Outcome
cherry qualitye0
Direction
slightly bettere0
Qualifier
4% to 5% O 2 and 7% to 8% CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This resulted in slightly better cherry quality for the bag with lower O 2 permeability (L204), which equilibrated at 4% to 5% O 2 and 7% to 8% CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lapins bags had 9–10% oxygen and 8–9% carbon dioxide.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Material
`Lapins'e0
Outcome
concentrations of 9% to 10% O 2 and 8% to 9% CO 2e0
Value
9% to 10% O 2 and 8% to 9% CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For `Lapins', the two MA bags showed concentrations of 9% to 10% O 2 and 8% to 9% CO 2 and similar final fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two MA bags yielded similar final Lapins fruit quality.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Material
`Lapins'e0
Outcome
final fruit qualitye0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For `Lapins', the two MA bags showed concentrations of 9% to 10% O 2 and 8% to 9% CO 2 and similar final fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Control cherries lost 6–13% weight over time.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
control treatmentse0
Outcome
weight losse0
Value
6% to 13%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant weight loss for the control treatments over time (6% to 13%), whereas the MA treatments showed minimal losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified atmosphere treatments had minimal weight loss.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
MA treatmentse0
Outcome
lossese0
Direction
minimale0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant weight loss for the control treatments over time (6% to 13%), whereas the MA treatments showed minimal losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MA storage increased cracking and decay incidence in Hedelfingen.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Material
`Hedelfingen'e0
Treatment
MA treatmentse0
Outcome
incidence of cracking and decaye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher incidence of cracking and decay was observed in MA treatments of `Hedelfingen' but not in `Lapins'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher cracking and decay incidence under MA storage was absent in Lapins.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Material
`Lapins'e0
Treatment
MA treatmentse0
Outcome
incidence of cracking and decaye0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher incidence of cracking and decay was observed in MA treatments of `Hedelfingen' but not in `Lapins'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Control cherries had significant stem shriveling and browning.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Treatment
Controle0
Outcome
shriveling and browning of stemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control cherries had significant shriveling and browning of stems; MA-stored cherries had green and healthy stems after 4 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MA-stored cherries retained green, healthy stems after four weeks.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Treatment
MA-storede0
Outcome
green and healthy stemse0
Qualifier
after 4 weekse0
Comparator
Controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control cherries had significant shriveling and browning of stems; MA-stored cherries had green and healthy stems after 4 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage treatments did not significantly differ for pH, acidity, soluble solids.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
storage treatmentse0
Outcome
pH, acidity, soluble solidse0
Direction
No significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were observed in pH, acidity, soluble solids, firmness, and hue angle among the storage treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage treatments did not significantly differ for firmness, and hue angle.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
storage treatmentse0
Outcome
firmness, and hue anglee0
Direction
No significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were observed in pH, acidity, soluble solids, firmness, and hue angle among the storage treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MA-packaged cherries appeared to maintain better color than controls.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
MA packagede0
Outcome
colore0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
control cherriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MA packaged cherries seemed to maintain better color than control cherries over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MA cherries had better appearance and eating quality than controls after four weeks.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
MAe0
Outcome
appearance and eating qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
after 4 weekse0
Comparator
control cherriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, MA cherries had better appearance and eating quality after 4 weeks when compared to control cherries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑

storage · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

storage · quality: general · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

storage · disease · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.