Paper · 2015

Growth, yield and biological indices of mediumduration pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) influenced byintercrop and different plant population

U.N. Dhandayuthapani; L. Vimalendran; K. R. Latha

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study was conducted to optimize the spacing for medium duration pigeonpea at different planting geometry and row proportions under intercropped situation, during kharif, 2011 at Millet Breeding Station of TNAU, Coimbatore,India. The treatments comprised of planting geometry (row spacing of 90, 120, 150 and 180 cm at varied level of plant to plant spacing with 30, 45 and 60 cm) and different row proportions of pigeonpea + greengram (1:2, 1:3, 1:4 and 1:5). The results indicated that plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio. Similarly biological indices like equivalent yield (2397 kg ha-1), land equivalent ratio (1.52), area time equivalent ratio (1.15) and income equivalent ratio (1.29) were higher in aforesaid treatment. This finding with optimum plant density along with appropriate row proportion will be affordable for the pulse growing farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 120 x 30 cm with greengram in a 1:3 row ratio achieved higher plant height, at 192.1 cm.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratioe1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
achieved highere1
Value
192.1 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 120 x 30 cm with greengram in a 1:3 row ratio achieved higher stem girth, at 7.9 cm.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratioe1
Outcome
stem girthe1
Direction
achieved highere1
Value
7.9 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 120 x 30 cm with greengram in a 1:3 row ratio achieved a higher number of branches, at 23.3.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratioe1
Outcome
number of branchese1
Direction
achieved highere1
Value
23.3e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 120 x 30 cm with greengram in a 1:3 row ratio achieved higher dry matter production, at 6342 kg/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratioe1
Outcome
dry matter productione1
Direction
achieved highere1
Value
6342 kg ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 120 x 30 cm with greengram in a 1:3 row ratio achieved higher yield, at 1741 kg/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratioe1
Outcome
yield of pigeonpeae1
Direction
achieved highere1
Value
1741 kg ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 120 x 30 cm with greengram in a 1:3 row ratio had higher equivalent yield, at 2397 kg/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
aforesaid treatmente2
Outcome
equivalent yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
2397 kg ha-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–712 · show in text ↑
e2

“biological indices like equivalent yield (2397 kg ha-1), land equivalent ratio (1.52), area time equivalent ratio (1.15) and income equivalent ratio (1.29) were higher in aforesaid treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 120 x 30 cm with greengram in a 1:3 row ratio had higher land equivalent ratio, at 1.52.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
aforesaid treatmente2
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Value
1.52e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–712 · show in text ↑
e2

“biological indices like equivalent yield (2397 kg ha-1), land equivalent ratio (1.52), area time equivalent ratio (1.15) and income equivalent ratio (1.29) were higher in aforesaid treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 120 x 30 cm with greengram in a 1:3 row ratio had higher area time equivalent ratio, at 1.15.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
aforesaid treatmente2
Outcome
area time equivalent ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Value
1.15e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–712 · show in text ↑
e2

“biological indices like equivalent yield (2397 kg ha-1), land equivalent ratio (1.52), area time equivalent ratio (1.15) and income equivalent ratio (1.29) were higher in aforesaid treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 120 x 30 cm with greengram in a 1:3 row ratio had higher income equivalent ratio, at 1.29.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
aforesaid treatmente2
Outcome
income equivalent ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Value
1.29e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–712 · show in text ↑
e2

“biological indices like equivalent yield (2397 kg ha-1), land equivalent ratio (1.52), area time equivalent ratio (1.15) and income equivalent ratio (1.29) were higher in aforesaid treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–914 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend optimum plant density with an appropriate row proportion for pulse-growing farmers.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Outcome
optimum plant density along with appropriate row proportione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height (192.1 cm), stem girth (7.9 cm), number of branches (23.3), dry matter production (6342 kg ha-1) and yield of pigeonpea (1741 kg ha-1) were achieved higher in pigeonpea (120 x 30 cm) + greengram 1:3 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–712 · show in text ↑
e3

“This finding with optimum plant density along with appropriate row proportion will be affordable for the pulse growing farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1042 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Vigna radiata var. radiata · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.