Paper · 2010 · Journal of Farm Sciences

Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions.

Arjun Sharma; Pandit S. Rathod; Mohan Chavan

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2005, 2006 and 2007 at Agricultural Research Station, Gulbarga, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka) on shallow black soils to study the effect integrated nutrient management practices on pigeonpea based intercropping systems. The treatments comprised of two intercropping systems of pigeonpea + pearlmillet (1:2) and pigeonpea + greengram (1:2) with 9 different integrated nutrient management levels. On the basis of 3 years results, pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (13.75 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (17.37 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 31273 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 22546 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.59) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (13.26 q ha-1, 15.76 q ha-1, Rs. 28365 ha- 1, Rs. 19838 ha-1 and 3.34, respectively). Among the INM practices, application of 50 per cent RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher pigeonpea yield (15.72 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (19.36 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 34849 ha-1) and net returns (Rs. 24506 ha-1) over other INM practices and it was found to be on par with application of phosphocompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + 50% RDF

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea + greengram intercropping gave significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (13.75 q/ha) than pigeonpea + pearlmillet.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + greengram intercropping systeme1
Outcome
pigeonpea seed yielde1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
13.75 q ha-1e1
Qualifier
13.26 q ha-1e1
Comparator
pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping systeme1
Setting
Gulbargae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2005, 2006 and 2007 at Agricultural Research Station, Gulbarga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (13.75 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (17.37 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 31273 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 22546 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.59) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (13.26 q ha-1, 15.76 q ha-1, Rs. 28365 ha- 1, Rs. 19838 ha-1 and 3.34, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea + greengram intercropping gave significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent yield (17.37 q/ha) than pigeonpea + pearlmillet.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + greengram intercropping systeme1
Outcome
pigeonpea equivalent yielde1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
17.37 q ha-1e1
Qualifier
15.76 q ha-1e1
Comparator
pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping systeme1
Setting
Gulbargae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2005, 2006 and 2007 at Agricultural Research Station, Gulbarga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (13.75 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (17.37 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 31273 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 22546 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.59) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (13.26 q ha-1, 15.76 q ha-1, Rs. 28365 ha- 1, Rs. 19838 ha-1 and 3.34, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea + greengram intercropping gave significantly higher gross returns (Rs. 31273 ha-1) than pigeonpea + pearlmillet.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + greengram intercropping systeme1
Outcome
gross returnse1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
Rs. 31273 ha-1e1
Qualifier
Rs. 28365 ha- 1e1
Comparator
pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping systeme1
Setting
Gulbargae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2005, 2006 and 2007 at Agricultural Research Station, Gulbarga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (13.75 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (17.37 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 31273 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 22546 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.59) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (13.26 q ha-1, 15.76 q ha-1, Rs. 28365 ha- 1, Rs. 19838 ha-1 and 3.34, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea + greengram intercropping gave significantly higher net returns (Rs. 22546 ha-1) than pigeonpea + pearlmillet.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + greengram intercropping systeme1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
Rs. 22546 ha-1e1
Qualifier
Rs. 19838 ha-1e1
Comparator
pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping systeme1
Setting
Gulbargae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2005, 2006 and 2007 at Agricultural Research Station, Gulbarga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (13.75 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (17.37 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 31273 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 22546 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.59) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (13.26 q ha-1, 15.76 q ha-1, Rs. 28365 ha- 1, Rs. 19838 ha-1 and 3.34, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea + greengram intercropping gave significantly higher B:C ratio (3.59) than pigeonpea + pearlmillet.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + greengram intercropping systeme1
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
3.59e1
Qualifier
3.34e1
Comparator
pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping systeme1
Setting
Gulbargae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2005, 2006 and 2007 at Agricultural Research Station, Gulbarga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (13.75 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (17.37 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 31273 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 22546 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.59) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (13.26 q ha-1, 15.76 q ha-1, Rs. 28365 ha- 1, Rs. 19838 ha-1 and 3.34, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% RDF plus vermicompost at 2.5 t/ha gave significantly higher pigeonpea yield (15.72 q/ha) than other integrated nutrient management practices.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
50 per cent RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
pigeonpea yielde2
Direction
significantly highere2
Value
15.72 q ha-1e2
Comparator
other INM practicese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 50 per cent RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher pigeonpea yield (15.72 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (19.36 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 34849 ha-1) and net returns (Rs. 24506 ha-1) over other INM practices and it was found to be on par with application of phosphocompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + 50% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% RDF plus vermicompost at 2.5 t/ha gave significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent yield (19.36 q/ha) than other integrated nutrient management practices.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
50 per cent RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
pigeonpea equivalent yielde2
Direction
significantly highere2
Value
19.36 q ha-1e2
Comparator
other INM practicese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 50 per cent RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher pigeonpea yield (15.72 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (19.36 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 34849 ha-1) and net returns (Rs. 24506 ha-1) over other INM practices and it was found to be on par with application of phosphocompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + 50% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% RDF plus vermicompost at 2.5 t/ha gave significantly higher gross returns (Rs. 34849 ha-1) than other integrated nutrient management practices.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
50 per cent RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
gross returnse2
Direction
significantly highere2
Value
Rs. 34849 ha-1e2
Comparator
other INM practicese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 50 per cent RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher pigeonpea yield (15.72 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (19.36 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 34849 ha-1) and net returns (Rs. 24506 ha-1) over other INM practices and it was found to be on par with application of phosphocompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + 50% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% RDF plus vermicompost at 2.5 t/ha gave significantly higher net returns (Rs. 24506 ha-1) than other integrated nutrient management practices.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
50 per cent RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
net returnse2
Direction
significantly highere2
Value
Rs. 24506 ha-1e2
Comparator
other INM practicese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 50 per cent RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher pigeonpea yield (15.72 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (19.36 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 34849 ha-1) and net returns (Rs. 24506 ha-1) over other INM practices and it was found to be on par with application of phosphocompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + 50% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 2.5 t/ha with 50% RDF gave pigeonpea yield on par with phosphocompost at 2.5 t/ha plus 50% RDF.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
pigeonpea yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
phosphocompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + 50% RDFe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 50 per cent RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher pigeonpea yield (15.72 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (19.36 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 34849 ha-1) and net returns (Rs. 24506 ha-1) over other INM practices and it was found to be on par with application of phosphocompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + 50% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1261 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.