Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Production potential of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus) intercropping patterns in semi arid tract of Haryana

SATISH KUMAR; R.C. SlNGH; V.S. KADIAN

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A 2 year field study was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 1999 and 2000, to evaluate different planting patterns of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.) intercropping in different row spacings. Higher monetary advantage (Rs 7,1971ha) and benefit : cost ratio (1.67) were recorded with sole pigeonpea at 45 cm row spacing and these were reduced with the increase in row spacing. All the intercrop ping patterns were superior in terms of pigeonpea equivalent yield and land equivalent ratio to sole crops. Among different intercropping patterns, pigeonpea (75 cm) greengram 1 :2 ratio gave the highest total yield (2,352 kglha), net returmand benefit : cost ratio (2.09). Greengram as an intercrop in different systems gave significantly lower , grain yield compared to sole crop. However, 1:2 ratio of planting resulted in the higher seed yield of intercrop com pared to 1 :1 ratio system irrespective of row spacing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole pigeonpea at 45 cm row spacing had the highest benefit-cost ratio (1.67).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
sole pigeonpea at 45 cm row spacinge1
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe1
Direction
Highere1
Value
1.67e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2 year field study was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 1999 and 2000, to evaluate different planting patterns of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.) intercropping in different row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–245 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher monetary advantage (Rs 7,1971ha) and benefit : cost ratio (1.67) were recorded with sole pigeonpea at 45 cm row spacing and these were reduced with the increase in row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole pigeonpea at 45 cm row spacing had the highest monetary advantage.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
sole pigeonpea at 45 cm row spacinge1
Outcome
monetary advantagee1
Direction
Highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2 year field study was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 1999 and 2000, to evaluate different planting patterns of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.) intercropping in different row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–245 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher monetary advantage (Rs 7,1971ha) and benefit : cost ratio (1.67) were recorded with sole pigeonpea at 45 cm row spacing and these were reduced with the increase in row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–429 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing row spacing reduced the benefit-cost ratio of pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
the increase in row spacinge1
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe1
Direction
reducede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2 year field study was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 1999 and 2000, to evaluate different planting patterns of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.) intercropping in different row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–245 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher monetary advantage (Rs 7,1971ha) and benefit : cost ratio (1.67) were recorded with sole pigeonpea at 45 cm row spacing and these were reduced with the increase in row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All intercropping patterns of pigeonpea were superior to sole crops in pigeonpea equivalent yield and land equivalent ratio.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
All the intercrop ping patternse2
Outcome
pigeonpea equivalent yield and land equivalent ratioe2
Direction
superiore2
Comparator
sole cropse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2 year field study was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 1999 and 2000, to evaluate different planting patterns of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.) intercropping in different row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–245 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the intercrop ping patterns were superior in terms of pigeonpea equivalent yield and land equivalent ratio to sole crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pigeonpea (75 cm) and greengram 1:2 pattern gave the highest total yield (2,352 kg/ha).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeonpea (75 cm) greengram 1 :2 ratioe3
Outcome
total yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
2,352 kglhae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2 year field study was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 1999 and 2000, to evaluate different planting patterns of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.) intercropping in different row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–245 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among different intercropping patterns, pigeonpea (75 cm) greengram 1 :2 ratio gave the highest total yield (2,352 kglha), net returmand benefit : cost ratio (2.09)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pigeonpea (75 cm) and greengram 1:2 pattern gave the highest benefit-cost ratio (2.09).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeonpea (75 cm) greengram 1 :2 ratioe3
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe3
Direction
higheste3
Value
2.09e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2 year field study was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 1999 and 2000, to evaluate different planting patterns of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.) intercropping in different row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–245 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among different intercropping patterns, pigeonpea (75 cm) greengram 1 :2 ratio gave the highest total yield (2,352 kglha), net returmand benefit : cost ratio (2.09)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Greengram as an intercrop gave significantly lower grain yield than sole greengram.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Material
Greengrame4
Treatment
intercrope4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
sole crope4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2 year field study was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 1999 and 2000, to evaluate different planting patterns of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.) intercropping in different row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–245 · show in text ↑
e4

“Greengram as an intercrop in different systems gave significantly lower , grain yield compared to sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:2 planting ratio gave higher intercrop seed yield than the 1:1 ratio irrespective of row spacing.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
1:2 ratio of plantinge5
Outcome
seed yield of intercrope5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
1 :1 ratio systeme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2 year field study was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 1999 and 2000, to evaluate different planting patterns of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.) intercropping in different row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–245 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, 1:2 ratio of planting resulted in the higher seed yield of intercrop compared to 1 :1 ratio system irrespective of row spacing”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 832–968 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

density · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 49 positive, 3 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.