Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pigeonpea + greengram intercropping gave significantly higher gross returns (Rs. 31273 ha-1) than pigeonpea + pearlmillet.

A claim from Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea + greengram intercropping gave significantly higher gross returns (Rs. 31273 ha-1) than pigeonpea + pearlmillet.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + greengram intercropping systeme1
Outcome
gross returnse1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
Rs. 31273 ha-1e1
Qualifier
Rs. 28365 ha- 1e1
Comparator
pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping systeme1
Setting
Gulbargae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2005, 2006 and 2007 at Agricultural Research Station, Gulbarga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132
e1

“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (13.75 q ha-1), pigeonpea equivalent yield (17.37 q ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 31273 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 22546 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.59) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (13.26 q ha-1, 15.76 q ha-1, Rs. 28365 ha- 1, Rs. 19838 ha-1 and 3.34, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–894

Title

Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions.

Arjun Sharma; Pandit S. Rathod; Mohan Chavan Journal of Farm Sciences 2010

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-3601c5ed44faeff4b1ad8aa8ee1742823c257d1ddc2e2831e7aaffc095196789 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.