Paper · 2017 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Site Specific nutrient management through targeted yield equations formulated for green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)

Subhashis Saren; Antaryami Mishra; Pradip Dey

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to formulate the fertilizer prescription equations for achieving desired yield target of green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) during 2013-14. Three fertility gradient stripes were created by applying no fertilizer, recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) and double of the RDF in rice in order to develop three fertility gradient stripes during kharif. Each strip was again sub-divided into 24 sub plots and green gram was cultivated with different treatment combinations. One plot was kept as absolute control while FYM was applied in two sub-plots and rest 21 plots were applied with different graded doses of fertilizers. Initial and post harvest soil nutrient status, nutrient uptake, nutrient requirement, soil efficiency, fertilizer efficiency and yield data were recorded. The highest yield (12.15 q ha-1) was achieved with application of 30:50:50 (N: P2O5: K2O). Fertilizer prescription equations were formulated by multiple regression equation for site specific nutrient management on the basis of initial soil fertility status and targeted yield approach. The equations and ready reckoner were developed for higher production with optimum use of fertilizers according to desired yield target of green gram with sustainable manner.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest green gram yield was 12.15 q ha-1 with 30:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O fertilizer.

Treatment
30:50:50 (N: P2O5: K2O)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.15 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield (12.15 q ha-1) was achieved with application of 30:50:50 (N: P2O5: K2O).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–119 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer prescription equations and a ready reckoner were developed for targeted green gram production.

Outcome
higher productione0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The equations and ready reckoner were developed for higher production with optimum use of fertilizers according to desired yield target of green gram with sustainable manner.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1271 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 50 positive, 4 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.