Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The highest green gram yield was 12.15 q ha-1 with 30:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O fertilizer.

A claim from Site Specific nutrient management through targeted yield equations formulated for green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest green gram yield was 12.15 q ha-1 with 30:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O fertilizer.

Treatment
30:50:50 (N: P2O5: K2O)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.15 q ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield (12.15 q ha-1) was achieved with application of 30:50:50 (N: P2O5: K2O).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–901
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–119

Title

Site Specific nutrient management through targeted yield equations formulated for green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)

Subhashis Saren; Antaryami Mishra; Pradip Dey Legume Research - An International Journal 2017. doi:10.18805/lr-3754

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-b60c07c9abc575c6bc0a39bab0f24ba51a2cc2ddd154e55309c0d185eba8af8d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 50 positive, 4 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.