Paper · 2017 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira

Wheat yield in the Cerrado as affected by nitrogen fertilization and inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense

Fernando Shintate Galindo; Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira Filho; Salatiér Buzetti; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
54
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense, associated with N rates and sources, in soil of the Cerrado (Brazilian savanna), on the grain yield of irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum). The experiment was carried out under a no-tillage system in a Typic Haplustox. The experimental design was randomized complete blocks with four replicates, in a 2x5x2 factorial arrangement: two N sources (urea and urea with NBPT urease inhibitor); five N rates applied as topdressing (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg ha-1); and with or without seed inoculation with A.brasilense. The increase in the N rates positively affected spike length, number of spikelets and of grains per spike, number of spikes per meter, N accumulation in the straw, leaf chlorophyll content, and grain yield of irrigated wheat, regardless of the use of NBPT urease inhibitor with conventional urea. Singly, inoculation with A.brasilense does not affect production components and grain yield, despite the increase in N content in wheat straw. The inoculation with A.brasilense, associated with the application of 140 kg ha-1 N, provides the highest grain yield of irrigated wheat cropped after corn in low-altitude Cerrado.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rates positively affected spike length, number of spikelets and grains per spike of irrigated wheat.

Organ / stage
spikee1
Treatment
N ratese1
Outcome
spike length, number of spikelets and of grains per spikee1
Direction
positively affectede1
Setting
Cerradoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in soil of the Cerrado (Brazilian savanna)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in the N rates positively affected spike length, number of spikelets and of grains per spike, number of spikes per meter, N accumulation in the straw, leaf chlorophyll content, and grain yield of irrigated wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rates positively affected number of spikes per meter, N accumulation in wheat straw and leaf chlorophyll content.

Organ / stage
strawe1
Treatment
N ratese1
Outcome
number of spikes per meter, N accumulation in the straw, leaf chlorophyll contente1
Direction
positively affectede1
Setting
Cerradoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in soil of the Cerrado (Brazilian savanna)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in the N rates positively affected spike length, number of spikelets and of grains per spike, number of spikes per meter, N accumulation in the straw, leaf chlorophyll content, and grain yield of irrigated wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rates positively affected grain yield of irrigated wheat.

Treatment
N ratese1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
positively affectede1
Setting
Cerradoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in soil of the Cerrado (Brazilian savanna)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in the N rates positively affected spike length, number of spikelets and of grains per spike, number of spikes per meter, N accumulation in the straw, leaf chlorophyll content, and grain yield of irrigated wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Singly, inoculation with A. brasilense does not affect production components or grain yield of wheat.

Treatment
inoculation with A.brasilensee2
Interactor
A.brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee2symbiont
Outcome
production components and grain yielde2
Direction
does not affecte2
Comparator
without seed inoculatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Singly, inoculation with A.brasilense does not affect production components and grain yield, despite the increase in N content in wheat straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1063 · show in text ↑
e4

“with or without seed inoculation with A.brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with A. brasilense alone was accompanied by increased N content in wheat straw.

Treatment
inoculation with A.brasilensee2
Interactor
A.brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee2symbiont
Outcome
N content in wheat strawe2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
without seed inoculatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Singly, inoculation with A.brasilense does not affect production components and grain yield, despite the increase in N content in wheat straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1063 · show in text ↑
e4

“with or without seed inoculation with A.brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with A. brasilense combined with 140 kg ha-1 N gave the highest grain yield of irrigated wheat cropped after corn in low-altitude Cerrado.

Treatment
inoculation with A.brasilense, associated with the application of 140 kg ha-1 Ne3
Interactor
A.brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee3symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Setting
low-altitude Cerradoe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The inoculation with A.brasilense, associated with the application of 140 kg ha-1 N, provides the highest grain yield of irrigated wheat cropped after corn in low-altitude Cerrado”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1244 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Azospirillum brasilense · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 92 positive, 9 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.