Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A. brasilense inoculation enhanced wheat N uptake and root, shoot and grain N accumulation at average and high N rates.

A claim from Improving Sustainable Field-Grown Wheat Production With Azospirillum brasilense Under Tropical Conditions: A Potential Tool for Improving Nitrogen Management · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. brasilense inoculation enhanced wheat N uptake and root, shoot and grain N accumulation at average and high N rates.

Treatment
inoculation with A. brasilensee0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
N uptake in wheat plants with increased root and shoot N accumulation and grain N accumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
average and high N application levelse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with A. brasilense enhanced AE, AFR and N uptake in wheat plants with increased root and shoot N accumulation and grain N accumulation under average and high N application levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1207

Title

Improving Sustainable Field-Grown Wheat Production With Azospirillum brasilense Under Tropical Conditions: A Potential Tool for Improving Nitrogen Management

Fernando Shintate Galindo; Paulo Humberto Pagliari; Guilherme Carlos Fernandes; et al. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2022. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.821628

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e0dcb253b571d00d8653b64121fb9ffadebc6cca4bfc691e1320b50be920f1f7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum brasilense · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

268 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.