Paper · 2024 · Discover Soil.

Evaluating the promise of diazotrophs from acid soils for improving early vigour and soil nutrient availability in wheat crop grown in contrasting pH environments

Thekke Kizhakkedath Saniya; Himani Priya; Venkatesh Kokila; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Mesocosm based experiment was conducted to evaluate and compare the performance of selected three promising diazotrophic bacterial isolates (B1, B2, B3, identified as Brucella oryzae , Brucella ciceri and Pseudomonas nitroreducens respectively) isolated from acidic soils of Jharkhand; pH 5.5–6.3). The experiment aimed to assess their efficacy on improving plant growth and soil nutrient availability in wheat grown under contrasting soil pH conditions—acidic soil from Jharkhand (pH: 6.3) and neutral soils from New Delhi (pH: 7.8) conducted under controlled conditions at National Phytotron Facility, of Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. Sampling done at 4 and 8 weeks after sowing revealed significant enhancement of 15–20% in N availability and organic C in soil, as well as improvement in plant biometrical and physiological attributes due to microbial inoculation. Additionally, there was a 15–30% increase in dehydrogenase activity and plant N content. Inoculation also led to a sharp increase in indole acetic acid (IAA) content in roots and leaves from plants grown in soils under both pH conditions, along with stimulation of leaf glutamine synthetase activity. Among the isolates, B1 was found to be superior in terms of plant growth enhancement and improving soil biological properties, while the combination of B1 + B2 was equally promising, as supported by PCA biplot analysis. Inoculation with these diazotrophic bacterial isolates positively influenced both soil properties and plant attributes, with more distinct effects observed under acidic soils of Jharkhand. The findings of this study provide a scientific foundation towards diazotrophic bacterial inoculation and development of region-specific growth invigorating inoculants for enhancing wheat production in acidic ecologies, with economic gains through the reduced use of N-fertilizers, and 25% N savings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation increased soil N availability by 15–20% in the wheat experiment.

Treatment
microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
N availabilitye0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
15–20%e0
Setting
soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sampling done at 4 and 8 weeks after sowing revealed significant enhancement of 15–20% in N availability and organic C in soil, as well as improvement in plant biometrical and physiological attributes due to microbial inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation increased soil organic C by 15–20%.

Treatment
microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
organic C in soile0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
15–20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sampling done at 4 and 8 weeks after sowing revealed significant enhancement of 15–20% in N availability and organic C in soil, as well as improvement in plant biometrical and physiological attributes due to microbial inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation improved wheat biometric and physiological attributes.

Treatment
microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
plant biometrical and physiological attributese0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sampling done at 4 and 8 weeks after sowing revealed significant enhancement of 15–20% in N availability and organic C in soil, as well as improvement in plant biometrical and physiological attributes due to microbial inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased soil dehydrogenase activity by 15–30%.

Treatment
microbial inoculatione1
Outcome
dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15–30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, there was a 15–30% increase in dehydrogenase activity and plant N content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sampling done at 4 and 8 weeks after sowing revealed significant enhancement of 15–20% in N availability and organic C in soil, as well as improvement in plant biometrical and physiological attributes due to microbial inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased plant N content by 15–30%.

Treatment
microbial inoculatione1
Outcome
plant N contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15–30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, there was a 15–30% increase in dehydrogenase activity and plant N content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sampling done at 4 and 8 weeks after sowing revealed significant enhancement of 15–20% in N availability and organic C in soil, as well as improvement in plant biometrical and physiological attributes due to microbial inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation sharply increased IAA content in wheat roots and leaves under both soil pH conditions.

Organ / stage
roots and leavese0
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
indole acetic acid (IAA) contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
both pH conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation also led to a sharp increase in indole acetic acid (IAA) content in roots and leaves from plants grown in soils under both pH conditions, along with stimulation of leaf glutamine synthetase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation stimulated leaf glutamine synthetase activity.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Gene
glutamine synthetasee0
Outcome
leaf glutamine synthetase activitye0
Direction
stimulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation also led to a sharp increase in indole acetic acid (IAA) content in roots and leaves from plants grown in soils under both pH conditions, along with stimulation of leaf glutamine synthetase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B1 was superior for plant growth enhancement and soil biological properties.

Treatment
B1e0
Outcome
plant growth enhancement and improving soil biological propertiese0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the isolates, B1 was found to be superior in terms of plant growth enhancement and improving soil biological properties, while the combination of B1 + B2 was equally promising, as supported by PCA biplot analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B1 + B2 combination was equally promising.

Treatment
B1 + B2e0
Outcome
equally promisinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the isolates, B1 was found to be superior in terms of plant growth enhancement and improving soil biological properties, while the combination of B1 + B2 was equally promising, as supported by PCA biplot analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation effects on soil and wheat attributes were more distinct in acidic Jharkhand soils.

Outcome
soil properties and plant attributese0
Direction
more distincte0
Setting
acidic soils of Jharkhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with these diazotrophic bacterial isolates positively influenced both soil properties and plant attributes, with more distinct effects observed under acidic soils of Jharkhand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1598 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 58 positive, 7 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.