Paper · 2017 · HortScience

Interspecific and Intergeneric Hybridization in Baptisia and Thermopsis

Susan M. Hawkins; John M. Ruter; Carol D. Robacker

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Interspecific and intergeneric crosses were performed between species in the genera Baptisia and Thermopsis with the goal of creating hybrids with the best qualities of both parents. Baptisia australis (L.) R. Br. was used as both the male and female parent in intergeneric crosses. Thermopsis chinensis Benth. ex S. Moore, T. lupinoides (L.) Link, and T. villosa Fernald & B.G. Schub. were used as male and female parents in both interspecific and intergeneric crosses. Pollen was collected from B. alba (L.) Vent., B. bracteata Muhl. ex Elliott, and B. lanceolata (Walt.) Ell. and used to make interspecific and intergeneric crosses. Putative hybrids were obtained from both interspecific and intergeneric crosses. Interspecific crosses produced a higher percentage of pollinations resulting in seed set and the number of seeds per pollination than intergeneric crosses. Morphological differences between parent species and progeny were evident in putative hybrids resulting from intergeneric crosses between T. villosa and B. australis and T. villosa and B. alba . Most putative hybrids bloomed during the second year after germination. Because seedlings could be obtained from both interspecific and intergeneric crosses, hybrids within and between the genera Baptisia and Thermopsis are feasible. The Fabaceae family contains 670–750 genera and 18,000–19,000 species. Baptisia (commonly called false or wild indigo) and Thermopsis (commonly named false lupine) of the Fabaceae belong to the tribe Thermopsidae, which comprises 46 species in six genera. All species in Thermopsis and Baptisia are herbaceous; they are the only two genera in Thermopsidae that do not have woody species. Thermopsis contains 23 species and has a wide-spread distribution with species endemic to Asia and much of temperate North America. Although Thermopsis is considered to have originated in central Asia, T. chinensis Benth. ex S. Moore and T. fabacea (Pallas) Candole are thought to have originated in North America and migrated over the Bering Land Strait to Asia. Three Thermopsis species, T. fraxinifolia Nutt. ex M.A. Curtis, T. mollis (Michx.) M.A. Curtis ex A. Gray, and T. villosa Fernald & B.G. Schub., are native to the southeastern United States. Baptisia contains 15–17 species that are endemic to the southeastern and midwestern United States.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putative hybrids arose from interspecific crosses.

Taxon
BaptisiaBaptisiat0
Treatment
interspecifice0
Outcome
Putative hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Baptisia
Baptisia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCurtis Hansen · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Putative hybrids were obtained from both interspecific and intergeneric crosses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baptisia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putative hybrids arose from intergeneric crosses.

Taxon
ThermopsisThermopsist0
Treatment
intergenerice0
Outcome
Putative hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thermopsis
Thermopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Putative hybrids were obtained from both interspecific and intergeneric crosses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thermopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interspecific crosses had a higher percentage of pollinations setting seed than intergeneric crosses.

Taxon
BaptisiaBaptisiat0
Treatment
Interspecific crossese0
Outcome
percentage of pollinations resulting in seed sete0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intergeneric crossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Baptisia
Baptisia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCurtis Hansen · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interspecific crosses produced a higher percentage of pollinations resulting in seed set and the number of seeds per pollination than intergeneric crosses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baptisia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interspecific crosses produced more seeds per pollination than intergeneric crosses.

Taxon
BaptisiaBaptisiat0
Treatment
Interspecific crossese0
Outcome
number of seeds per pollinatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intergeneric crossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Baptisia
Baptisia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCurtis Hansen · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interspecific crosses produced a higher percentage of pollinations resulting in seed set and the number of seeds per pollination than intergeneric crosses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baptisia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putative T. villosa × B. australis hybrids differed morphologically from parents.

Taxon
B. australisBaptisia australise0
Material
putative hybridse0
Outcome
Morphological differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Baptisia australis
Baptisia australis · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Morphological differences between parent species and progeny were evident in putative hybrids resulting from intergeneric crosses between T. villosa and B. australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1038 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most putative hybrids bloomed during their second year after germination.

Taxon
putative hybridse0
Outcome
bloomed during the second year after germinatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Most putative hybrids bloomed during the second year after germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1138 · show in text ↑