Abstract
Abstract. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of depth of topdressing fertilization on the SPAD value and plant height during whole growth stage of winter wheat. Experiments were conducted for one growing season under field conditions with three different kinds of row spacing (10+20) cm, (12+18) cm and (15+15) cm were chosen based on wheat agronomy in north China. The topdressing depth of (3-4, 5-6, 7-8 and 9-10 cm) was applied in (10+20) cm and (12+18) cm row spacing block, fertilizer was scatered on the surface in block (15+15) cm as control group. The results showed that row spacing did not significantly affect the SPAD but significantly affect plant height of winter wheat, depth of fertilization had a significant effect on SPAD and plant height. Plant height measured in block of (10+20) cm row spacing was higher than block (12+18) cm. The SPAD and plant height had a higher value at deth 7-8 cm than other depth treats in block (10+20) cm and (12+18) cm, which also higher than block (15+15) cm. Thus, row spacing set as (10+20) cm, depth of topdressing fertilization at 7-8 cm was the best treats in this study.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing did not significantly affect wheat SPAD.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- row spacinge0
- Outcome
- SPADe0
- Direction
- did not significantly affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“row spacing did not significantly affect the SPAD”
t0“winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing significantly affected wheat plant height.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- row spacinge0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“row spacing did not significantly affect the SPAD but significantly affect plant height of winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization depth significantly affected wheat SPAD and height.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- depth of fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- SPAD and plant heighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“depth of fertilization had a significant effect on SPAD and plant height”
t0“winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat height was higher at (10+20) cm spacing than (12+18) cm.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- (10+20) cm row spacinge0
- Outcome
- Plant heighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- (12+18) cme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plant height measured in block of (10+20) cm row spacing was higher than block (12+18) cm.”
t0“winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
SPAD was higher at 7-8 cm depth than other depths and the control block.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 7-8 cme0
- Outcome
- SPADe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- block (10+20) cm and (12+18) cme0
- Comparator
- other depth treatse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The SPAD and plant height had a higher value at deth 7-8 cm than other depth treats in block (10+20) cm and (12+18) cm, which also higher than block (15+15) cm.”
t0“winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height was higher at 7-8 cm depth than other depths and the control block.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 7-8 cme0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- block (10+20) cm and (12+18) cme0
- Comparator
- other depth treatse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The SPAD and plant height had a higher value at deth 7-8 cm than other depth treats in block (10+20) cm and (12+18) cm, which also higher than block (15+15) cm.”
t0“winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors favored (10+20) cm spacing and 7-8 cm topdressing depth.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- row spacing set as (10+20) cm, depth of topdressing fertilization at 7-8 cme0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“row spacing set as (10+20) cm, depth of topdressing fertilization at 7-8 cm was the best treats in this study”
t0“winter wheat”
The same questions in other papers
density · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
106 papers more in this group
See all 110 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.