Paper · 2017 · International Turfgrass Society research journal

Physiological Responses of Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) to a Tryptophan‐Containing Organic Byproduct

Isaac Mertz; Nick Christians; Erik H. Ervin; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Amino acid‐based products have been used as alternative fertilizer nitrogen (N) sources to improve turfgrass performance, especially where there is a strong reliance on synthetic N sources. However, the physiological mechanisms underlying improvements in turfgrass performance are not well documented. The objective of this research was to determine whether applications of a tryptophan‐containing organic byproduct (TRP‐B) or tryptophan (TRP) + urea improve creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis stolonifera L.) performance compared with standalone applications of urea, a commonly used synthetic N source. At two separate universities, mature ‘A‐4’ creeping bentgrass plugs were transplanted into containers and allowed to re‐establish in growth chambers before being treated. Treatments included TRP‐B, urea, and TRP + urea applied every 14 d at three different N rates: 2.5, 12.25, and 24.5 kg N ha −1 . At the trial's end, TRP‐B and TRP + urea increased leaf indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA) by 227 and 255%, respectively, relative to urea at the high N rate, as measured at day 42 of the study. Applications of TRP‐B and TRP + urea also increased root biomass by 22 and 20%, respectively, when compared with urea only at the high N rate. The TRP‐B and TRP + urea treatments did not impact leaf total amino acids or photochemical efficiency when compared with urea only. Overall, results indicate that application of TRP‐B or TRP + urea at 24.5 kg N ha −1 every 2 wk may improve leaf and root IAA content, root biomass, and subsequent creeping bentgrass quality relative to applications of urea only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRP-B increased leaf indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) by 227% relative to urea at the high N rate.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
TRP‐Be1
Outcome
indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
227e1
Comparator
urea at the high N ratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“TRP‐B and TRP + urea increased leaf indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA) by 227 and 255%, respectively, relative to urea at the high N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRP + urea increased leaf indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) by 255% relative to urea at the high N rate.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
TRP + ureae1
Outcome
indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
255e1
Comparator
urea at the high N ratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“TRP‐B and TRP + urea increased leaf indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA) by 227 and 255%, respectively, relative to urea at the high N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRP-B increased root biomass by 22% relative to urea only at the high N rate.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Organ / stage
roote2
Treatment
TRP‐Be2
Outcome
root biomasse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
22e2
Comparator
urea onlye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“Applications of TRP‐B and TRP + urea also increased root biomass by 22 and 20%, respectively, when compared with urea only at the high N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRP + urea increased root biomass by 20% relative to urea only at the high N rate.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Organ / stage
roote2
Treatment
TRP + ureae2
Outcome
root biomasse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
20e2
Comparator
urea onlye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“Applications of TRP‐B and TRP + urea also increased root biomass by 22 and 20%, respectively, when compared with urea only at the high N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRP-B and TRP + urea did not impact leaf total amino acids or photochemical efficiency compared with urea only.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Organ / stage
leafe3
Treatment
TRP‐B and TRP + ureae3
Outcome
leaf total amino acids or photochemical efficiencye3
Direction
did not impacte3
Comparator
urea onlye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“The TRP‐B and TRP + urea treatments did not impact leaf total amino acids or photochemical efficiency when compared with urea only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1360 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Applying TRP-B or TRP + urea at 24.5 kg N ha-1 every 2 wk may improve creeping bentgrass quality relative to urea only.

Taxon
Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Organ / stage
leaf and roote4
Treatment
application of TRP‐B or TRP + urea at 24.5 kg N ha −1 every 2 wke4
Outcome
creeping bentgrass qualitye4
Comparator
urea onlye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“application of TRP‐B or TRP + urea at 24.5 kg N ha −1 every 2 wk may improve leaf and root IAA content, root biomass, and subsequent creeping bentgrass quality relative to applications of urea only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1590 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.