Abstract
Impact of nitrogenous fertilizer and insecticides on incidence of leafhopper, Amrasca biguttula biguttula in okra was carried out at Agronomy Farm, B. A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand during Kharif, 2015. Results of pooled over three sprays during kharif, 2015 revealed that flonicamid (0.65) was found significantly superior than rest of the insecticides. The second best insecticide was dinotefuran (1.49). Thiamethoxam (2.23) and dimethoate (2.52) were at par with each other. While different doses of nitrogenous fertilizer did not have significant impact on population development of leafhopper. The interaction between different doses of nitrogenous fertilizer and insecticides was found non-significant. It indicated that there was no any significant impact of nitrogenous fertilizers on efficacy of insecticides on leafhopper in okra.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Flonicamid had the lowest reported leafhopper incidence and was significantly superior to the other insecticides.
- Taxon
- Okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- flonicamide0
- Interactor
- Leafhoppert0pest
- Outcome
- Incidence of Leafhoppert0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 0.65e0
- Comparator
- rest of the insecticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“flonicamid (0.65) was found significantly superior than rest of the insecticides”
t0“Incidence of Leafhopper, Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) in Kharif Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Dinotefuran ranked second among insecticides for leafhopper incidence, at 1.49.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- dinotefurane0
- Interactor
- Leafhoppert1pest
- Outcome
- Incidence of Leafhoppert1
- Direction
- second beste0
- Value
- 1.49e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The second best insecticide was dinotefuran (1.49).”
t0“Okra”
t1“Incidence of Leafhopper”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam and dimethoate were at par for leafhopper incidence.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust1
- Treatment
- Thiamethoxame0
- Interactor
- Leafhoppert0pest
- Outcome
- Incidence of Leafhoppert0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Value
- 2.23e0
- Qualifier
- 2.52e0
- Comparator
- dimethoatee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Thiamethoxam (2.23) and dimethoate (2.52) were at par with each other.”
t0“Incidence of Leafhopper”
t1“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer doses did not significantly alter leafhopper population development.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- different doses of nitrogenous fertilizere0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere0pest
- Outcome
- population development of leafhoppere0
- Direction
- did not have significant impacte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“different doses of nitrogenous fertilizer did not have significant impact on population development of leafhopper”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of nitrogen fertilizer doses and insecticides on leafhopper control was not significant.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust1
- Treatment
- different doses of nitrogenous fertilizer and insecticidese0
- Interactor
- Leafhoppert0pest
- Outcome
- interactione0
- Direction
- non-significante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between different doses of nitrogenous fertilizer and insecticides was found non-significant.”
t0“Leafhopper”
t1“Okra”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.