Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Performance of Direct Seeded Upland Rice (Oryza sativa L) as Influenced by Seed Priming and Micro-Nutrients in Old Alluvial Zone of West Bengal, India

Tapas Kumar Pandit; Saikat Mookherjee

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2015-16 and 2016-17 at the Regional Research Station (Old Alluvial Zone), Dakshin Dinajpur under Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya to study the effect of seed priming and foliar application of micronutrients on direct seeded upland rice (Oryza sativa L). The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with nine treatment combinations comprising seed priming and foliar spray of micronutrients. Treatments were replicated thrice. Significantly highest yield (3667.03 kg ha-1) was recorded in seed priming with 2.2% CaCl2. This priming treatment also had greater impact in production economics (return rupee-1 of investment is 1.45) of direct seeded rice. The rice seed priming with water showed poor productivity leading to less remuneration. Foliar spray with chelated zinc and solubor at 35 and 55 DAS respectively showed improvement in yield components and yield of direct seeded rice (3546.98 kg ha-1) compared to sole application of chelated zinc and solubor at 35 and 55 DAS. Return rupee-1 of investment (1.42) was highest when direct seeded rice crop received two foliar spray with chelated zinc and solubor at 35 and 55 DAS. No remarkable changes have been observed in pH, available N, P2O5 and K2O status in the soil after two years of the experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 seed priming gave the highest rice yield of 3667.03 kg ha-1.

Treatment
seed priming with 2.2% CaCl2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3667.03 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly highest yield (3667.03 kg ha-1) was recorded in seed priming with 2.2% CaCl2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 seed priming yielded a return of 1.45 rupees per rupee invested.

Treatment
This priming treatmente0
Outcome
return rupee-1 of investmente0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1.45e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This priming treatment also had greater impact in production economics (return rupee-1 of investment is 1.45) of direct seeded rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water seed priming produced poor rice productivity and lower remuneration.

Treatment
seed priming with watere0
Outcome
poor productivity leading to less remuneratione0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice seed priming with water showed poor productivity leading to less remuneration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated zinc and solubor foliar sprays improved rice yield components and yield to 3546.98 kg ha-1.

Treatment
Foliar spray with chelated zinc and solubor at 35 and 55 DASe0
Outcome
yield components and yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
3546.98 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
sole application of chelated zinc and solubor at 35 and 55 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray with chelated zinc and solubor at 35 and 55 DAS respectively showed improvement in yield components and yield of direct seeded rice (3546.98 kg ha-1) compared to sole application of chelated zinc and solubor at 35 and 55 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two foliar sprays gave the highest return per rupee invested, 1.42.

Treatment
two foliar spray with chelated zinc and solubor at 35 and 55 DASe0
Outcome
Return rupee-1 of investmente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.42e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Return rupee-1 of investment (1.42) was highest when direct seeded rice crop received two foliar spray with chelated zinc and solubor at 35 and 55 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1198 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH and available N, P2O5 and K2O showed no remarkable change after two years.

Outcome
pH, available N, P2O5 and K2O status in the soile0
Direction
No remarkable changese0
Qualifier
after two years of the experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No remarkable changes have been observed in pH, available N, P2O5 and K2O status in the soil after two years of the experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.