Paper · 2017 · Journal of Crop Improvement

Determining corn nitrogen rates using multiple prediction models

Jeff Rutan; Kurt Steinke

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Weather uncertainty and soil spatial variability impact nitrogen (N) cycling and corn (Zea mays L.) growth, making accurate N predictions a challenge. Field studies were conducted in Lansing, Michigan, to evaluate a computer model (i.e., Adapt-N), a preseason year-based model (i.e., maximum return to N [MRTN]), and a crop sensor model (i.e., active canopy sensor with algorithm) for recommending corn N rates. To determine site-specific economic optimum N rates (EONR), five N rates were also applied (0, 33%, 66%, 133%, and 166% of the suggested MRTN) as starter + sidedress (SD) at V4. In a wet year (i.e., 2015), Adapt-N increased V8 SD N rates 35 kg N ha−1 relative to the MRTN V4 SD N application. Although the greater rate of N may have provided additional yield protection, no statistical yield differences were observed between the two models. The MRTN model increased partial factor productivity (PFP) 20% relative to Adapt-N. Limited expression of V8 corn N deficiency reduced crop sensor total N rates (21–56 kg N ha−1) and yield (0.82–1.05 Mg ha−1) relative to other models. In a drier year (i.e., 2016), N demand was reduced (EONR 64 kg N ha−1 less than 2015), resulting in similar corn response to all three models. Despite differences in actual corn N rate recommendations, all three models resulted in similar economic net returns across study years.Abbreviations: EONR, economic optimum nitrogen rate; MRTN, Maximum Return to Nitrogen; NUE, nitrogen-use efficiency; PFP, partial factor productivity; SBNRC, sensor-based nitrogen rate calculator; SD, side-dress

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adapt-N raised V8 sidedress nitrogen rates by 35 kg N ha−1 in wet 2015.

Outcome
V8 SD N ratese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35 kg N ha−1e0
Comparator
MRTN V4 SD N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a wet year (i.e., 2015), Adapt-N increased V8 SD N rates 35 kg N ha−1 relative to the MRTN V4 SD N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ statistically between Adapt-N and MRTN.

Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
no statisticale0
Comparator
MRTNe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no statistical yield differences were observed between the two models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adapt-N increased V8 SD N rates 35 kg N ha−1 relative to the MRTN V4 SD N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRTN increased partial factor productivity by 20% relative to Adapt-N.

Outcome
partial factor productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
Adapt-Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The MRTN model increased partial factor productivity (PFP) 20% relative to Adapt-N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensor model reduced total nitrogen rates by 21–56 kg N ha−1 compared with other models.

Outcome
crop sensor total N ratese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21–56 kg N ha−1e0
Comparator
other modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Limited expression of V8 corn N deficiency reduced crop sensor total N rates (21–56 kg N ha−1) and yield (0.82–1.05 Mg ha−1) relative to other models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1087 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensor model reduced yield by 0.82–1.05 Mg ha−1 compared with other models.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.82–1.05 Mg ha−1e0
Comparator
other modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Limited expression of V8 corn N deficiency reduced crop sensor total N rates (21–56 kg N ha−1) and yield (0.82–1.05 Mg ha−1) relative to other models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1087 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drier 2016 had an EONR 64 kg N ha−1 below 2015.

Outcome
EONRe0
Direction
less thane0
Value
64 kg N ha−1e0
Comparator
2015e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a drier year (i.e., 2016), N demand was reduced (EONR 64 kg N ha−1 less than 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn responded similarly to all three models in 2016.

Outcome
corn responsee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
all three modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in similar corn response to all three models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1230 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three models gave similar economic net returns across years.

Outcome
economic net returnse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
all three modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all three models resulted in similar economic net returns across study years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑