Paper · 2009 · eScholarship (California Digital Library)

Effect of potasium, Zinc and Copper on vegative growth of two wheat cultivars under water stress

M. Moussavi-Nik; Hamid Reza Mobasser

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat production is constrained in arid and semi arid areas, where water is the limiting factor for plant growth. This study investigated the effect of irrigation deficit at the end of the productive growth stage and utilization of P, Zn and Cu on biological yield, in two bread wheat cultivars. The result of this experiment demonstrate that irrigation deficit at the anthesis stage did not significantly effect leaf and stem dry weight in the anthesis and maturity stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation deficit at anthesis did not significantly affect leaf or stem dry weight at anthesis and maturity.

Organ / stage
anthesis and maturity stagese0
Treatment
irrigation deficit at the anthesis stagee0
Outcome
leaf and stem dry weighte0
Direction
did not significantly effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation deficit at the anthesis stage did not significantly effect leaf and stem dry weight in the anthesis and maturity stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.