Paper · 2017 · Scientia Agraria

Soybean and wheat response to cropping and tillage system after two decades in an oxisol under subtropical climate in Brazil

Moacir Tuzzin de Moraes; Henrique Debiasi; J. C. Franchini

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

EnglishO sistema plantio direto tem sido um dos principais sistemas conservacionistas dos solos em regioes tropicais e subtropicais. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar parâmetros de rendimento e morfologicos de soja e de trigo em Latossolo Vermelho sob sistemas de manejo e modelos de producao em regiao de clima Subtropical (Londrina, Brasil, latitude 23o11’S; longitude 51o11’W; e 620 m de altitude). O delineamento de blocos ao acaso foi usado, em esquema fatorial, com cinco preparos, dois modelos de producao e quatro repeticoes. Os preparos do solo incluiram o convencional; minimo escarificado anualmente ou a cada tres anos; sistema plantio direto com 11 anos; e sistema plantio direto com 24 anos. O fator sistema de cultivo foi comporto por rotacao e sucessao de culturas. Na cultura de soja foi avaliada a produtividade de graos, massa de mil graos, altura de plantas e de insercao do primeiro legume, teores de clorofila e indice de vegetacao por diferenca normalizada, ja na cultura de trigo foram avaliadas a produtividade e o pH dos graos. As produtividades de graos de soja e de trigo nao foram alteradas em funcao dos modelos de producao. Entre os tempos de adocao do sistema plantio direto nao houve diferencas de producao de graos, sendo maior do que no preparo convencional. A escarificacao do solo nao incrementou a produtividade de graos das culturas. Assim, a escarificacao do solo sob as condicoes edafoclimaticas deste estudo e uma pratica de manejo dispensavel devido a ausencia de incrementos morfologicos e produtivos para soja e trigo. portuguesNo-tillage system have been a mainly conservationist system specially in tropical and subtropical climate conditions. The aim of this work was to evaluate yield components and morphological soybean and wheat in Rhodic Eutrudox under tillage and cropping systems in Subtropical climate (Londrina, Brazil, latitude 23o11’S; longitude 51o11’W; and 620 m in altitude). This study was carried with five tillage and two cropping systems, on completely randomized block design, with four replications. Tillage systems consisted of conventional tillage with disk harrow; minimum tillage with annual chiselling; minimum tillage with chiselling every three years; no-tillage for 11 years; and no-tillage for 24 years. The factor cropping systems was represented by crop rotation and crop succession. In the soybean crop were evaluated yield, mass of 1000 grains, plant height, and first pod insertion of soybean, chlorophyll content and the vegetation index normalized difference. Furthermore, for the wheat cropping was evaluated the grain yield and hectolitre weight. Soybean and wheat grain yields were not changed due to cropping systems. Soybeans yield in no-tillage with 24 years was higher than in conventional tillage; and soybean and wheat yields were not affected by times under no-till adoption. Soil chiselling not favoured increased in productivity of soybean and wheat. Thus, soil chiselling under this climate conditions is an unnecessary practice due to absence of productive and morphological improvement for soybean and wheat cropping.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean grain yield did not change with cropping systems.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
cropping systemse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
not changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean and wheat grain yields were not changed due to cropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2637–2709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield did not change with cropping systems.

Treatment
cropping systemse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
not changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean and wheat grain yields were not changed due to cropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2637–2709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield under 24 years of no tillage exceeded conventional tillage.

Taxon
SoybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
no-tillage with 24 yearse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybeans yield in no-tillage with 24 years was higher than in conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2710–2792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was not affected by duration of no-till adoption.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
times under no-till adoptione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean and wheat yields were not affected by times under no-till adoption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2798–2872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was not affected by duration of no-till adoption.

Treatment
times under no-till adoptione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean and wheat yields were not affected by times under no-till adoption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2798–2872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil chiselling did not improve soybean productivity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Soil chisellinge0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
not favoured increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil chiselling not favoured increased in productivity of soybean and wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2874–2950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil chiselling did not improve wheat productivity.

Treatment
Soil chisellinge0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
not favoured increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil chiselling not favoured increased in productivity of soybean and wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2874–2950 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil chiselling was judged unnecessary for soybean production under these conditions.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
soil chisellinge0
Outcome
unnecessary practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil chiselling under this climate conditions is an unnecessary practice due to absence of productive and morphological improvement for soybean and wheat cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2957–3119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil chiselling was judged unnecessary for wheat production under these conditions.

Treatment
soil chisellinge0
Outcome
unnecessary practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil chiselling under this climate conditions is an unnecessary practice due to absence of productive and morphological improvement for soybean and wheat cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2957–3119 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 35 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 71 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.