Paper · 2017 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Growth, yield and water use efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum): response to biochar and phosphorus fertilizer application

Siphiwe Lusiba; Jude Odhiambo; John Ogola

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during summer (2013/2014) and winter (2014) in two different soil types to evaluate the effect of biochar and P fertilizer application on growth, yield, and water use efficiency of chickpea. Soil types include Rhodic Ferralsols (clay) in Thohoyandou and Leptic Cambisols (loamy sand) in Nelspruit, South Africa. Treatments consisted of a factorial combination of four biochar levels (0, 5, 10 and 20 t ha−1) and two phosphorus fertilizer levels (0 and 90 kg ha−1) arranged in a randomized complete block design and replicated three times. Biochar application at 5 t ha−1 significantly increased biomass, grain yield and water use efficiency of biomass production (WUEb) in the clay soil compared to 10 and 20 t ha−1. However, the increase was attributed to the addition of P fertilizer. Biochar application had no effect on yield components in the loamy sand soil, but P fertilizer addition increased number of seeds/pod in the loamy sand soil and number of pods/plant in the clay soil. Biochar and P fertilizer application on growth and yield of chickpea varied in soil types and seasons, as the effect was more prominent in the clay soil than the loamy sand soil during the summer sowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 5 t ha−1 significantly increased biomass, grain yield and water use efficiency of biomass production in clay soil compared with 10 and 20 t ha−1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Biochar application at 5 t ha−1e1
Outcome
biomass, grain yield and water use efficiency of biomass production (WUEb)e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
10 and 20 t ha−1e1
Setting
clay soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, yield and water use efficiency of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biochar application at 5 t ha−1 significantly increased biomass, grain yield and water use efficiency of biomass production (WUEb) in the clay soil compared to 10 and 20 t ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer addition increased the number of seeds per pod of chickpea in loamy sand soil.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
P fertilizer additione2
Outcome
number of seeds/pode2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
loamy sand soile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, yield and water use efficiency of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e2

“P fertilizer addition increased number of seeds/pod in the loamy sand soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer addition increased the number of pods per plant of chickpea in clay soil.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
P fertilizer additione3
Outcome
number of pods/plante3
Direction
increasede3
Setting
clay soile3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, yield and water use efficiency of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e3

“P fertilizer addition increased number of seeds/pod in the loamy sand soil and number of pods/plant in the clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application had no effect on yield components of chickpea in loamy sand soil.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Biochar applicatione4
Outcome
yield componentse4
Direction
no effecte4
Setting
loamy sand soile4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, yield and water use efficiency of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“Biochar application had no effect on yield components in the loamy sand soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and P fertilizer effects on chickpea growth and yield varied across soil types and seasons, being more prominent in clay soil than loamy sand soil in summer sowing.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Biochar and P fertilizer applicatione5
Outcome
growth and yield of chickpeae5
Direction
variede5
Qualifier
more prominent in the clay soil than the loamy sand soile5
Setting
summer sowinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, yield and water use efficiency of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e5

“Biochar and P fertilizer application on growth and yield of chickpea varied in soil types and seasons, as the effect was more prominent in the clay soil than the loamy sand soil during the summer sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1222 · show in text ↑

biochar · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

biochar · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.