Paper · 2017 · Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences

ALLELOPATHIC PROPENSITY OF THE AQUEOUS LEAF EXTRACT AND LEAF LITTER OF Melia dubia CAV. ON PULSE CROPS

N S Thakur; Dinesh Kumar; R P Gunaga; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
11
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Gas Chromatography Mass-Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis revealed that leaf litter of Melia dubia contain phenolic acids and its derivatives, unsaturated fatty acid, alkaloids, methyl ketones (volatile allelochemical), aromatic ketone, chromene etc. Further it was reported that the aqueous leaf extracts (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% concentration) and leaf litter (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 g/pot) inhibited the germination, growth (shoot length, shoot length and vigour index) and initial biomass (shoot, root and total biomass) of green gram and black chickpea. Percentage of inhibition in germination and initial growth parameters increased with the increasing the concentration of aqueous extract or litter amount of M. dubia. However, pot experiments, carried out till crop maturity, revealed that there was no significant allelopathic effect on growth, biomass and grain yield of the test crops. This indicates that the allelochemicals present in M. dubia leaf litter are volatile in nature and their effect is transient in nature.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melia dubia leaf litter contained several chemical classes including phenolic acids and alkaloids.

Taxon
Melia dubiaMelia dubiae0
Organ / stage
leaf littere0
Outcome
phenolic acids and its derivatives, unsaturated fatty acid, alkaloidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melia dubia
Melia dubia · TaxonKeystone Foundation Uploaded by Vinayaraj · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf litter of Melia dubia contain phenolic acids and its derivatives, unsaturated fatty acid, alkaloids, methyl ketones (volatile allelochemical), aromatic ketone, chromene etc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melia dubia leaf litter contained methyl ketones, aromatic ketone and chromene.

Taxon
Melia dubiaMelia dubiae0
Organ / stage
leaf littere0
Outcome
methyl ketones (volatile allelochemical), aromatic ketone, chromenee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melia dubia
Melia dubia · TaxonKeystone Foundation Uploaded by Vinayaraj · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf litter of Melia dubia contain phenolic acids and its derivatives, unsaturated fatty acid, alkaloids, methyl ketones (volatile allelochemical), aromatic ketone, chromene etc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous Melia dubia leaf extract inhibited germination, growth and initial biomass of green gram.

Treatment
aqueous leaf extracts (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% concentration)e0
Outcome
germination, growth (shoot length, shoot length and vigour index) and initial biomass (shoot, root and total biomass)e0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aqueous leaf extracts (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% concentration) and leaf litter (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 g/pot) inhibited the germination, growth (shoot length, shoot length and vigour index) and initial biomass (shoot, root and total biomass) of green gram and black chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melia dubia leaf litter inhibited germination, growth and initial biomass of green gram.

Treatment
leaf litter (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 g/pot)e0
Outcome
germination, growth (shoot length, shoot length and vigour index) and initial biomass (shoot, root and total biomass)e0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aqueous leaf extracts (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% concentration) and leaf litter (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 g/pot) inhibited the germination, growth (shoot length, shoot length and vigour index) and initial biomass (shoot, root and total biomass) of green gram and black chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous Melia dubia leaf extract inhibited germination, growth and initial biomass of black chickpea.

Taxon
black chickpeae0
Treatment
aqueous leaf extracts (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% concentration)e0
Outcome
germination, growth (shoot length, shoot length and vigour index) and initial biomass (shoot, root and total biomass)e0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“aqueous leaf extracts (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% concentration) and leaf litter (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 g/pot) inhibited the germination, growth (shoot length, shoot length and vigour index) and initial biomass (shoot, root and total biomass) of green gram and black chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melia dubia leaf litter inhibited germination, growth and initial biomass of black chickpea.

Taxon
black chickpeae0
Treatment
leaf litter (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 g/pot)e0
Outcome
germination, growth (shoot length, shoot length and vigour index) and initial biomass (shoot, root and total biomass)e0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“aqueous leaf extracts (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% concentration) and leaf litter (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 g/pot) inhibited the germination, growth (shoot length, shoot length and vigour index) and initial biomass (shoot, root and total biomass) of green gram and black chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–549 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibition of germination and initial growth increased with aqueous extract concentration.

Taxon
PULSE CROPSt0
Treatment
aqueous extracte0
Outcome
Percentage of inhibition in germination and initial growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

t0

“PULSE CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Percentage of inhibition in germination and initial growth parameters increased with the increasing the concentration of aqueous extract or litter amount of M. dubia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–716 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibition of germination and initial growth increased with litter amount.

Taxon
PULSE CROPSt0
Treatment
litter amount of M. dubiae0
Outcome
Percentage of inhibition in germination and initial growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

t0

“PULSE CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Percentage of inhibition in germination and initial growth parameters increased with the increasing the concentration of aqueous extract or litter amount of M. dubia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–716 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pot trials through crop maturity found no significant allelopathic effect on growth, biomass or grain yield.

Taxon
PULSE CROPSt0
Outcome
growth, biomass and grain yielde0
Qualifier
till crop maturitye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“PULSE CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“pot experiments, carried out till crop maturity, revealed that there was no significant allelopathic effect on growth, biomass and grain yield of the test crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–887 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that Melia dubia leaf-litter allelochemicals are volatile and their effects transient.

Taxon
M. dubiaMelia dubiae0
Organ / stage
leaf littere0
Outcome
their effect is transient in naturee0
Qualifier
volatile in naturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melia dubia
Melia dubia · TaxonKeystone Foundation Uploaded by Vinayaraj · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allelochemicals present in M. dubia leaf litter are volatile in nature and their effect is transient in nature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1023 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 59 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.