Paper · 2017 · Horticulture International Journal

Evaluation of Different Manures Application on Fruit Quality of Tomato in the Derived Savannah Ecological Zone of Nigeria

Abolusoro PF

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of different manures on the fruit quality of tomato in the derived savannah ecological zone of Nigeria. Nutrient components such as Lycopene, vitamin C content, Protein, total mineral content, sugar, lipids ash as well as water content were evaluated as affected by different manure application. Number of days to fruit decay after harvest was also evaluated using standard method. The result from the experiment showed that there were no significant differences among the various manure evaluated on the nutrient components of the test plant as well as the number of days to fruit rottening. However, numerical differences were observed in some cases though not peculiar and or consistent to any of the manure under investigation. Showed that manure type does not significantly affect the fruit quality of tomato. Keywords: Fruit quality; Tomato; Manure; Nutrient composition; Shelf life

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure type did not significantly change the nutrient components of tomato fruit.

Treatment
various manuree1
Outcome
nutrient componentse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fruit Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“there were no significant differences among the various manure evaluated on the nutrient components of the test plant as well as the number of days to fruit rottening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure type did not significantly change the number of days to fruit rot of tomato.

Treatment
various manuree1
Outcome
number of days to fruit rotteninge1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fruit Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“there were no significant differences among the various manure evaluated on the nutrient components of the test plant as well as the number of days to fruit rottening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–645 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 41 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 226 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.