Paper · 2017 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Technical and economic viability of co-inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense in soybean cultivars in the Cerrado

Fernando S. Galindo; Marcelo C. M. Teixeira Filho; Salatier Buzetti; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
57
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) efficiency can be increased by co-inoculation with bradyrhizobia and Azospirillum brasilense, allowing even greater uptake of water and nutrients, leading to higher yields. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the technical and economic viability of soybean in the Cerrado, according to the cultivars and co-inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense. The experiment was conducted in Selvíria, MS, in no-tillage system, in Oxisol, arranged in a randomized block design in a 2 x 2 factorial scheme with two cultivars (‘Potência’ and ‘Valiosa’), with and without co-inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense in the seed. Co-inoculation with A. brasilense increases grain yield in the cultivars ‘Potência’ and ‘Valiosa’, being economically viable. However, using the cultivar ‘Potência’ co-inoculated led to the highest profitability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased Potência grain yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Potênciae0
Treatment
Co-inoculation with A. brasilensee0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-inoculation with A. brasilense increases grain yield in the cultivars ‘Potência’ and ‘Valiosa’, being economically viable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased Valiosa grain yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Valiosae0
Treatment
Co-inoculation with A. brasilensee0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-inoculation with A. brasilense increases grain yield in the cultivars ‘Potência’ and ‘Valiosa’, being economically viable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation was economically viable.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Co-inoculation with A. brasilensee0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
economically viablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-inoculation with A. brasilense increases grain yield in the cultivars ‘Potência’ and ‘Valiosa’, being economically viable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculated Potência achieved the highest profitability.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Potênciae0
Treatment
co-inoculatede0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilenset1symbiont
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using the cultivar ‘Potência’ co-inoculated led to the highest profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Azospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–79 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.