Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The mixed Bradyrhizobium and A. brasilense inoculant increased soybean productivity by 28% compared with the control without nitrogen.

A claim from Combination of Azospirillum and Bradyrhizobium on Inoculant Formulation Improve Nitrogen Biological Fixation in Soybean · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed Bradyrhizobium and A. brasilense inoculant increased soybean productivity by 28% compared with the control without nitrogen.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
mixed inoculant containing Bradyrhizobium spp. and A. brasilensee2
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium spp.Bradyrhizobiume2symbiont
Second interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee2symbiont
Outcome
productivitye2
Direction
increasese2
Value
28%e2
Comparator
control without nitrogene2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The use of the mixed inoculant containing Bradyrhizobium spp. and A. brasilense in the same formulation meets the demand of grain N export and resulted in increases of 28%, 18% and 7.4% in soybean productivity compared with control without nitrogen, mineral N fertilizer and standard liquid inoculant of Bradyrhizobium spp. respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–2027
t0

“Nitrogen Biological Fixation in Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–119

Title

Combination of Azospirillum and Bradyrhizobium on Inoculant Formulation Improve Nitrogen Biological Fixation in Soybean

Mateus Manara Picoli; João Vitor Gomes Pasquetto; Cesar Yoshio Muraoka; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2022. doi:10.5539/jas.v14n4p145

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ca8ef856b193875c94a23204d64136d787e9735e982c80dc2fc1fb8ec3e53477 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Bradyrhizobium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this claim · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

557 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.