Paper · 2017 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Hydroalcoholic Extract of Crambe on Sitophilus zeamais Insects and Maize Seed Quality

Ana Paula Morais Mourão Simonetti; Divair Christ

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of this work is to evaluate the insecticidal and attractiveness of concentrations of hydroalcoholic extract of crambe grains on Sitophilus zeamais, and its effect on the physiological quality of corn seeds. The experiments were conducted at the Laboratory of Entomology and Seeds of the Assis Gurgacz University Center, in Cascavel, PR. The evaluation of attractiveness and insecticidal effect were evaluated using DIC, with 4 treatments (0, 5, 15 and 25% extract concentration) and 10 or 5 replications, respectively, totaling 40 experimental plots for the insect attractiveness test and 20 Experimental plots for the test of the insecticidal effect. For the experiment on the physiological quality of corn seeds submitted to the extracts, a DIC was set up in a 4 × 4 factorial scheme, factor 1 being the storage time of the seeds (0, 30, 60 and 90 days) and factor 2, the concentrations (0, 5, 15 and 25%), with 4 replicates, totaling 64 plots. Data were submitted to ANAVA, and means adjusted to regression or submitted to the Tukey test at 5% of probability, using the statistical program ASSISTAT®. The results evidenced the treatment with a hydroalcoholic extract in the concentration of 25% as the one with the highest insecticidal effect, and extract at 15% concentration yields a higher percentage of germination, normal seedlings, and mass of seedlings than the control. At 25% concentration, the extract do not negatively influence any of the parameters analyzed. Storage time above 60 days stimulates germination, mass and length of maize seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydroalcoholic extract of crambe at 25% concentration had the highest insecticidal effect on Sitophilus zeamais in maize seed trials

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
hydroalcoholic extracte1
Interactor
Sitophilus zeamaisSitophilus zeamaist0pest
Outcome
insecticidal effecte1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
in the concentration of 25%e1
Setting
Laboratory of Entomology and Seedse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sitophilus zeamais Insects and Maize Seed Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results evidenced the treatment with a hydroalcoholic extract in the concentration of 25% as the one with the highest insecticidal effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1259 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted at the Laboratory of Entomology and Seeds of the Assis Gurgacz University Center, in Cascavel, PR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract at 15% concentration gave a higher percentage of germination, normal seedlings and seedling mass than the control in maize seeds

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
extract at 15% concentratione2
Outcome
percentage of germination, normal seedlings, and mass of seedlingse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sitophilus zeamais Insects and Maize Seed Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“extract at 15% concentration yields a higher percentage of germination, normal seedlings, and mass of seedlings than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract at 25% concentration did not negatively influence the analysed seed parameters

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
25% concentratione3
Outcome
parameters analyzede3
Direction
do not negatively influencee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sitophilus zeamais Insects and Maize Seed Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“At 25% concentration, the extract do not negatively influence any of the parameters analyzed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage time above 60 days stimulated germination, mass and length of maize seedlings

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
Storage time above 60 dayse4
Outcome
germination, mass and length of maize seedlingse4
Direction
stimulatese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Storage time above 60 days stimulates germination, mass and length of maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1574 · show in text ↑

storage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 41 positive, 21 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

botanical · Sitophilus zeamais · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 113 positive, 4 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.