Paper · 2017 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Manganese in RR Cotton as Affected by Glyphosate

João Paulo Gonsiorkiewicz Rigon; Silvia Capuani; Jayme Ferrari Neto; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

There is evidence that glyphosate application in soybean tolerant to herbicides could interfere in the manganese (Mn) nutrition of the crop, but there is no information on this effect in cotton plants. This study aimed at assessing manganese accumulation and distribution in cotton as affected by glyphosate application. The experiment was conducted in nutrient solution with four Mn concentrations and two cotton cultivars: conventional NuOpal and NuOpal tolerant to glyphosate (RR). Glyphosate was applied or not to the tolerant cultivar. The inclusion of the glyphosate resistance gene in cotton and herbicide, application increased shikimic acid (ShA) concentration in the plants. Glyphosate application decreased cotton leaf area and the dry matter production of the plant structures. The adverse effects of glyphosate were not overcome with higher Mn rates in the solution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The resistance gene and herbicide application increased shikimic acid concentration in cotton.

Treatment
inclusion of the glyphosate resistance gene in cotton and herbicide, applicatione0
Gene
glyphosate resistance genee0
Outcome
shikimic acid (ShA) concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inclusion of the glyphosate resistance gene in cotton and herbicide, application increased shikimic acid (ShA) concentration in the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate application decreased cotton leaf area.

Treatment
Glyphosate applicatione0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate application decreased cotton leaf area and the dry matter production of the plant structures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate application decreased dry matter production of cotton plant structures.

Treatment
Glyphosate applicatione0
Outcome
dry matter production of the plant structurese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate application decreased cotton leaf area and the dry matter production of the plant structures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher manganese rates did not overcome the adverse effects of glyphosate on cotton.

Treatment
higher Mn rates in the solutione0
Outcome
adverse effects of glyphosatee0
Direction
not overcomee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“The adverse effects of glyphosate were not overcome with higher Mn rates in the solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–879 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

13 papers: 4 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

61 papers: 35 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

glyphosate · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

herbicide · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.