Paper · 2017 · Egyptian Journal of Agronomy

Influence of Irrigation Intervals under Different Sowing Dates on Water Relations, Yield and Quality Nutrition of Guar Forage Crop

ZIZY ABBAS; NEMATALLH MOKHTAR; Salah Bo-Feteih

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

TWO FIELD experiments were conducted at Giza Agriculture Research Station during the two growing seasons of 2015 and 2016. The investigation was carried out to study the effect of different irrigation intervals, i.e., two weeks and three weeks in combination with different sowing dates, i.e., 1st April ,15th April , 1st May and 15th May on Guar forage crop (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.,var. Shandaweel 1 ) crop - water relations, yield and yield components under middle Egypt conditions. The main results could be summarized as follows:-The number of applied irrigations and seasonal water consumptive use (CU) were increased with decreasing irrigation interval days which the shortage irrigation interval (irrigation every 15 days) recorded the maximum CU under all sowing date with an overall average being 442 and 453 mm for first and second season, respectively. The same trend was found with sowing date, with plant sown in 1st April consumed more water than the other sowing dates. The lowest water use efficiency (WUE) was recorded under longer irrigation interval (irrigation every 21days) comparable to (irrigation every 15 days) and values of WUE differed due to sowing date, which the S4 (sowing at 15th May) gave the lowest WUE while, S1( sowing at 1st April) obtained the highest value. The crop coefficient (Kc) values started small and increased to reach their maximum values in mid season under all sowing dates, then decline again until the crop maturity under all sowing dates.All yield and yield component traits were markedly affected by sowing date and irrigation interval. Most of the studied traits except leaves/stem ratio as well as fiber %, decreased by delaying sowing date from 1st April to 15th May. Decreasing irrigation interval days from 21 to 15 days significantly increased plant height, number of branches/plant, fresh and dry yield ton fad-1, while leaves/stem ratio and crud fiber% which increased by increasing irrigation intervals from 15 to 21 days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shorter irrigation intervals increased the number of irrigations.

Taxon
Guar Forage Cropt0
Treatment
decreasing irrigation interval dayse0
Outcome
number of applied irrigationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The number of applied irrigations and seasonal water consumptive use (CU) were increased with decreasing irrigation interval days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar Forage Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shorter irrigation intervals increased seasonal water consumption, reaching 442 and 453 mm in the first and second seasons with irrigation every 15 days.

Taxon
Guar Forage Cropt0
Treatment
irrigation every 15 dayse0
Outcome
seasonal water consumptive use (CU)e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
442 and 453 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“seasonal water consumptive use (CU) were increased with decreasing irrigation interval days which the shortage irrigation interval (irrigation every 15 days) recorded the maximum CU under all sowing date with an overall average being 442 and 453 mm for first and second season, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar Forage Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guar sown on 1 April consumed more water than plants sown at other dates.

Taxon
Guar Forage Cropt0
Treatment
1st Aprile0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other sowing datese0

Verbatim

e0

“plant sown in 1st April consumed more water than the other sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar Forage Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 21 days gave lower water use efficiency than irrigation every 15 days.

Taxon
Guar Forage Cropt0
Treatment
irrigation every 21dayse0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
irrigation every 15 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest water use efficiency (WUE) was recorded under longer irrigation interval (irrigation every 21days) comparable to (irrigation every 15 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar Forage Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on 15 May gave the lowest water use efficiency, whereas sowing on 1 April gave the highest.

Taxon
Guar Forage Cropt0
Treatment
sowing at 15th Maye0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
sowing at 1st Aprile0

Verbatim

e0

“S4 (sowing at 15th May) gave the lowest WUE while, S1( sowing at 1st April) obtained the highest value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar Forage Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The crop coefficient rose to a midseason maximum then declined toward maturity across sowing dates.

Taxon
Guar Forage Cropt0
Outcome
crop coefficient (Kc)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under all sowing datese0

Verbatim

e0

“The crop coefficient (Kc) values started small and increased to reach their maximum values in mid season under all sowing dates, then decline again until the crop maturity under all sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar Forage Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most studied traits decreased when sowing was delayed from 1 April to 15 May, apart from leaves to stem ratio and fiber percentage.

Taxon
Guar Forage Cropt0
Treatment
15th Maye0
Outcome
Most of the studied traitse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
except leaves/stem ratio as well as fiber %e0
Comparator
1st Aprile0

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the studied traits except leaves/stem ratio as well as fiber %, decreased by delaying sowing date from 1st April to 15th May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar Forage Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 15 rather than 21 days significantly increased plant height, branch number, and fresh and dry yield.

Taxon
Guar Forage Cropt0
Treatment
15 dayse0
Outcome
plant height, number of branches/plant, fresh and dry yield ton fad-1e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
21e0

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing irrigation interval days from 21 to 15 days significantly increased plant height, number of branches/plant, fresh and dry yield ton fad-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar Forage Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals increased leaves to stem ratio and crude fiber percentage.

Taxon
Guar Forage Cropt0
Treatment
21 dayse0
Outcome
leaves/stem ratio and crud fiber%e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
15e0

Verbatim

e0

“leaves/stem ratio and crud fiber% which increased by increasing irrigation intervals from 15 to 21 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar Forage Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–130 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.